Opinion No. 71-138

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Opinion No. 71-138

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports·Decided February 19, 1971·Published

Opinion

OPINION — AG — **** LIMITATIONS OF VOTER FRANCHISE **** ALTHOUGH THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE X, SECTION 9(A) (AUTHORIZING AN AD VALOREM TAX LEVY TO BE VOTED TO ASSIST IN FINANCING A COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT) ARE NOT DIRECTLY INVALIDATED BY RECENT UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT DECISIONS, AN ELECTION UNDER SAID SECTION COULD BE DEFEATED BY PROPER ACTION BECAUSE THE VOTER FRANCHISE IS UNCONSTITUTIONALLY LIMITED UNDER THE PRINCIPLES OF "CITY OF PHOENIX V. KOLODZIEJSKI" (GARY M. BUSH) ** SEE: OPINION NO. 71-413 (1971) **

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION — AG — **** LIMITATIONS OF VOTER FRANCHISE **** ALTHOUGH THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE X, SECTION 9(A) (AUTHORIZING AN AD VALOREM TAX LEVY TO BE VOTED TO ASSIST IN FINANCING A COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT) ARE NOT DIRECTLY INVALIDATED BY RECENT UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT DECISIONS, AN ELECTION UNDER SAID SECTION COULD BE DEFEATED BY PROPER ACTION BECAUSE THE VOTER FRANCHISE IS UNCONSTITUTIONALLY LIMITED UNDER THE PRINCIPLES OF "CITY OF PHOENIX V. KOLODZIEJSKI" (GARY M. BUSH) ** SEE: OPINION NO. 71-413 (1971) **

Opinion No. 71-138, (Okla. Super. Ct. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion No. 71-138 (Opinion No. 71-138) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.