Opinion No. 71-138

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Opinion No. 71-138

DecidedFebruary 19, 1971

StatusPublished

This text of Opinion No. 71-138 (Opinion No. 71-138) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Opinion No. 71-138, (Okla. Super. Ct. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION — AG — **** LIMITATIONS OF VOTER FRANCHISE **** ALTHOUGH THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE X, SECTION 9(A) (AUTHORIZING AN AD VALOREM TAX LEVY TO BE VOTED TO ASSIST IN FINANCING A COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT) ARE NOT DIRECTLY INVALIDATED BY RECENT UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT DECISIONS, AN ELECTION UNDER SAID SECTION COULD BE DEFEATED BY PROPER ACTION BECAUSE THE VOTER FRANCHISE IS UNCONSTITUTIONALLY LIMITED UNDER THE PRINCIPLES OF "CITY OF PHOENIX V. KOLODZIEJSKI" (GARY M. BUSH) ** SEE: OPINION NO. 71-413 (1971) **

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION — AG — **** LIMITATIONS OF VOTER FRANCHISE **** ALTHOUGH THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE X, SECTION 9(A) (AUTHORIZING AN AD VALOREM TAX LEVY TO BE VOTED TO ASSIST IN FINANCING A COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT) ARE NOT DIRECTLY INVALIDATED BY RECENT UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT DECISIONS, AN ELECTION UNDER SAID SECTION COULD BE DEFEATED BY PROPER ACTION BECAUSE THE VOTER FRANCHISE IS UNCONSTITUTIONALLY LIMITED UNDER THE PRINCIPLES OF "CITY OF PHOENIX V. KOLODZIEJSKI" (GARY M. BUSH) ** SEE: OPINION NO. 71-413 (1971) **

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Opinion No. 71-138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-71-138-oklaag-1971.