Opinion No. 69-253
This text of Opinion No. 69-253 (Opinion No. 69-253) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION — AG — **** PAROLE — REVOCATION — HEARING — GOVERNOR **** THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS' RULING IN CASE NO. A-14729 (CHASE V. PAGE) IS NOT BINDING AS A PROCEDURAL MATTER UPON THE FUNCTION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS IN RECOMMENDING REVOCATIONS TO THE GOVERNOR. YOUR CURRENT PRACTICE OF ADVISING THE VIOLATOR OF THE GROUNDS FOR REVOCATION REQUEST, TAKING HIS STATEMENT, IF HE GIVES ONE, AND A REVIEW OF THE CASE BY THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR AND DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS BEFORE SUBMISSION TO THE GOVERNOR IS INSUFFICIENT TO COMPLY WITH THE HEARING REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN THE CHASE V. PAGE, SUPRA. THE DUTY TO CONDUCT THE HEARING IS UPON THE OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR. CITE: 57 O.S. 1968 Supp., 501 [
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Opinion No. 69-253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-69-253-oklaag-1969.