Opinion No. 69-251 (1969) Ag

CourtOklahoma Attorney General Reports
DecidedSeptember 17, 1969
StatusPublished

This text of Opinion No. 69-251 (1969) Ag (Opinion No. 69-251 (1969) Ag) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Opinion No. 69-251 (1969) Ag, (Okla. Super. Ct. 1969).

Opinion

State Funds — Banks — Amount Deposited Title 62 O.S. 88 [62-88] (1969), gives the State Treasurer sole authority to determine the amount of surplus public funds in his custody to be deposited in any bank approved by the State Depository Board. The Attorney General has considered your request for an opinion on the following question: Does O.S.L. 1969, ch. 27, Section 1 (62 O.S. 88 [62-88] (1969)) give the State Treasurer sole authority to determine the amount of surplus public funds in his custody to be deposited in any bank approved by the State Depository Board? The operation of said statute has been suspended due to a referendum petition having been filed thereon. The pertinent portion of said statute is as follows: "The State Treasurer, being vested with authority to determine the amount of surplus public funds in his custody to be deposited in any bank approved by the State Depository Board, is hereby directed to obtain no less than 4.10% per annum interest from all time deposits." (Emphasis added) The critical inquiry must be to determine the meaning of "being vested." The `word "being" has been held to be equivalent to "which is." Lingo v. Gulf Life Insurance Co., 32 Ala. App. 525, So.2d 697 (1946); State ex rel. Porter v. Ritchie, 32 Utah 381, 91 P. 24 (1907). In 92 C.JS., p. 1003, "vested" is defined as meaning "accrued, fixed, settled, absolute . . . it is employed to denote the quality of a present right or interest." The statute in question must then be said to provide in effect: "The State Treasurer who is fixed, settled, absolute, with, or who has, authority to determine the amount of surplus public funds in his custody to be deposited in any bank approved by the State Depository Board. . . ." The Oklahoma Supreme Court stated in In Re Estate of Redwine, Okl ., 445 P.2d 275 (1968), at p. 277, that: "When the language of a statute is plain and unambiguous, no room for — construction exists." The Attorney General is therefore of the opinion that your question be answered affirmatively, as follows: O.S.L.-1969, ch. 27, Section 1 (62 O.S. 88 [62-88] (1969)) gives the State Treasurer sole authority to determine the amount of surplus public funds in his custody to be deposited in any bank approved by the State Depository Board. (Dell Gordon)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Estate of Redwine
1968 OK 122 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1968)
Lingo v. Gulf Life Ins. Co.
27 So. 2d 697 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1946)
State ex rel. Porter v. Ritchie
91 P. 24 (Utah Supreme Court, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Opinion No. 69-251 (1969) Ag, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-69-251-1969-ag-oklaag-1969.