Opinion No. 69-163 (1969) Ag

CourtOklahoma Attorney General Reports
DecidedApril 1, 1969
StatusPublished

This text of Opinion No. 69-163 (1969) Ag (Opinion No. 69-163 (1969) Ag) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Opinion No. 69-163 (1969) Ag, (Okla. Super. Ct. 1969).

Opinion

Marriage Ceremony — District Judge Under the provisions of 43 O.S. 7 [43-7] (1961), it is not mandatory for a District Court Judge to perform a marriage ceremony if so requested by a couple having a valid marriage license. The Attorney General has had under consideration your letter dated March 21, 1969, in which you inquire as follows: "Must a Judge of the District Court perform a marriage ceremony if requested so to do by a couple having a valid marriage license?" Title 43 O.S. 7 [43-7] (1961), provides in pertinent part as follows: "All marriages must be contracted by a formal ceremony performed or solemnized in the presence of at least two adult, competent persons as witnesses, by a justice or judge of any court of record in this State, a justice of the peace or a preacher or minister of the gospel, priest or other ecclesiastical dignitary of any denomination . . . ." This statute authorizes a justice or judge of any court of record to solemnize a marriage, but does not make it an official duty of such judge to perform a marriage ceremony. No additional authority has been found which would make it a duty of a justice or judge of any court of record to solemnize a marriage. It is, therefore, the opinion of the Attorney General that under the provisions of 43 O.S. 7 [43-7] (1961), it is not mandatory for a District Court Judge to perform a marriage ceremony if so requested by a couple having a valid marriage license. (Gary F. Glasgow)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Opinion No. 69-163 (1969) Ag, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-69-163-1969-ag-oklaag-1969.