Opinion No. 69-106 (1969) Ag

CourtOklahoma Attorney General Reports
DecidedMarch 10, 1969
StatusPublished

This text of Opinion No. 69-106 (1969) Ag (Opinion No. 69-106 (1969) Ag) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Opinion No. 69-106 (1969) Ag, (Okla. Super. Ct. 1969).

Opinion

Health Department Buildings — Construction A county may construct necessary county buildings to be used in part by a local health department with funds derived from a bond issue and levy pursuant to Article X, Section 26 Oklahoma Constitution, and 19 O.S. 1961 Section 301[19-301] [19-301] et seq., and Section 734. Alternatively, such construction could be financed pursuant to 19 O.S. 731 [19-731] (1961) et seq. Funds derived from a levy pursuant to Article X, Section 9A Oklahoma Constitution, and 63 O.S. 1-223 [63-1-223] (1968) et seq. may be expended only for maintaining and operating a local department of health. The Attorney General has considered your letter requesting an official opinion wherein you state that a county has derived a sum of money from a special two-mill levy, which levy was pursuant to O.S.L. 1963, ch. 325, Art. 2, Sections 223, 224 (63 O.S. 1-223 [63-1-223], 68 O.S. 1-224 [68-1-224] (1968)), to use in conjunction with federal matching funds to construct a county facility which would be used in part as a County Health Clinic, but would also contain certain other county facilities. You inquire: "Can the monies derived from the special two mill levy for the Delaware County Health Department be used to construct a neighborhood facility in conjunction with federal funds." Article X, Section 9(a) Oklahoma Constitution, provides as follows: "For the purpose of maintaining or aiding in maintaining a department of health within any county of the State, an additional levy not to exceed two and one-half mills on the dollar of the assessed valuation of the county may be levied annually, when such levy is approved by a majority of the qualified ad valorem tax paying voters of the county, voting on the question at an election called for such purpose by the Board of County Commissioners, or by initiative petition by voters of a county. A maximum levy of two and one-half mills may be made for such purpose after such approval until repealed by a majority of the qualified ad valorem tax paying voters of the county, voting on the question at an election called for such purpose by the Board of County Commissioners, or by initiative petition by voters of a county. Such department of health may be maintained jointly or in conjunction with one or more counties, cities, towns or school districts, or any combination thereof, and shall be maintained as now or hereafter provided by law. Nothing herein shall prohibit other levies or the use of other public funds for such department of health." Pertinent provisions of the Oklahoma Public Health Code, O.S.L. 1963 ch. 325 (63 O.S. 1-101 [63-1-101] (1968) et seq.), are in part as follows: O.S.L. 1963 ch. 325, Art. 2, Section 205(a) (63 O.S. 1-205 [63-1-205](a) (1968)): "The County Board of Health may, with the approval of the State Commissioner of Health, establish and maintain a County Department of Health, the maintenance and operation of which is hereby declared to be a function of county government for which appropriations may be made from the General Fund of the county and the proceeds of a levy made in accordance with Section 9A, Article 10, Oklahoma Constitution." O.S.L. 1963 ch. 325, Art. 2, Section 223 (63 O.S. 1-223 [63-1-223] (1968)): "A levy of not to exceed two and one-half (2 1/2%) mills on the dollar of assessed valuation of a county may be levied annually in accordance with the provisions of Section 9A, Article 10, Oklahoma Constitution, for the purpose of providing funds to maintain or aid in maintaining a County, District or Cooperative Department of Health, where such levy is approved by a majority of the qualified ad valorem taxpaying voters of the county, voting on the question at an election called for such purpose; and the amount of the levy so approved may continue to be made annually until repealed by a majority of the qualified ad valorem taxpaying voters of the county, voting on the question at an election called for such purpose." O.S.L. 1963, ch. 325, Art. 2, Section 226 (63 O.S. 1-226 [63-1-226] (1968)): "The County Board of Health shall annually file with the county excise board an estimate of needs for the operation or maintenance of the County, District or Cooperative Department of Health to the extent that county funds are required for such purpose, and it shall be the mandatory duty of the county excise board to approve the same to the extent that such estimate of needs can be financed with proceeds of a levy authorized in accordance with the provisions of Section 9A, Article 10, Oklahoma Constitution; and so much of the levy as may be needed shall thereupon be ordered made. The estimate of needs may include, in addition to items for current operating expenses, items for anticipated capital outlay in the future which may accumulate from year to year until the total required amounts will be available for expenditure. Provided, that nothing herein shall prohibit the appropriation or use of other county funds for such purposes, or for other public health purposes." It is apparent that the constitutional and statutory provisions, supra, all contemplate "maintenance" or "maintenance and operation" only. The term "maintenance" does not include cost of construction. See Madeley v. Trustees of Conroe Independent School Dist. Tex., 130 S.W.2d 929 (1939). The Attorney General is therefore of the opinion that your question be answered negatively, as follows: Funds derived from a levy pursuant to Article X, Section 9A Oklahoma Constitution, and 63 O.S. 1-223 [63-1-223] (1968) et seq. may be expended only for maintaining and operating a local department of health. In the hope of assisting you, we present the following two alternative methods of raising funds which can legitimately be expended upon the desired construction. We also note that since other county facilities are to be placed in the proposed facility, authority must be found for the construction of something more than a building for the use only as a county health department. We therefore direct your attention to 19 O.S. 731 [19-731

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Madeley v. Trustees of Conroe Independent School Dist.
130 S.W.2d 929 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Opinion No. 69-106 (1969) Ag, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-69-106-1969-ag-oklaag-1969.