Opinion No. 68-143 (1968) Ag
This text of Opinion No. 68-143 (1968) Ag (Opinion No. 68-143 (1968) Ag) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
School District Annexation — Affect When Dependent School District No. 107, Lincoln County, voted and was annexed to Dependent School District No. 2 Lincoln County, it was not removed from Central Oklahoma Area Vocational Technical School District No. 3. The three-mill levy is an obligation assumed by the patrons within Central Oklahoma Area Vocational Technical School District No. 3. Therefore, only those patrons within the former School District No. 107, Lincoln County, are responsible for the levy. The Attorney General has considered your request for an opinion concerning the following facts. On May 9, 1967, the Central Oklahoma Area Vocational Technical School, District No. 3, consisting of certain school districts located in Creek, Lincoln and Payne Counties was created by a vote of the people residing in these school districts in these counties. One of these districts, Dependent School District No. 107, Lincoln County, voted to be a part of Central Oklahoma Area Vocational Technical School District No. 3. At the same election, Dependent School District No. 2, Lincoln County, voted not to be a part of Central Oklahoma Area Vocational Technical School District No. 3. October 25, 1967, the patrons of Dependent School District No. 107, Lincoln County, voted to annex to Dependent School District No. 2, and by a legal majority did so, thereby ceasing to exist and becoming a part of Dependent School District No. 2. On December 19, 1967, the patrons of Central Oklahoma Area Vocational Technical School District No. 3 voted a three-mill levy to be spread over the entire district to finance the school. You ask, in effect: 1. When Dependent School District No. 107 voted and was annexed to Dependent School District No. 2, did this remove Dependent School District No. 107 from Central Oklahoma Area Vocational Technical School District No. 3? 2. If not, will the three-mill levy voted by the patrons of Central Oklahoma Area Vocational Technical School District No. 3 be spread over just that part of School District No. 2 that was formerly Dependent School District No. 107 or must the levy be assumed by the whole of Dependent School District No. 2? Article
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Opinion No. 68-143 (1968) Ag, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-68-143-1968-ag-oklaag-1968.