Opinion No. 68-113 (1968) Ag

CourtOklahoma Attorney General Reports
DecidedJune 24, 1968
StatusPublished

This text of Opinion No. 68-113 (1968) Ag (Opinion No. 68-113 (1968) Ag) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Opinion No. 68-113 (1968) Ag, (Okla. Super. Ct. 1968).

Opinion

Turnpike Authority — Trust Agreement — Liability Under Section 905 of the Trust Agreement between the Turnpike Authority and the First National Bank and Trust Company of Oklahoma City a separate contract may be entered into fixing the compensation to be paid to the Trustee. The Trustee may debit the account of the Turnpike Authority for the amount of the fee only if they fail within a reasonable time to pay the fee. The Trustee does not have the right to invest in certificates of deposit issued by the Trustee Bank. The Trustee is not required to give security on investments made pursuant to Article VI of the Trust Agreement in regard to certificates of deposit issued by a qualified bank. The Trustee has as its secondary duty the obligation to obtain the highest rate of interest on those investments made. The Trustee is not liable or responsible for any loss resulting from any investment authorized by Section 602. The Attorney General has considered your request of January 17, 1968. Certain questions are presented which require the interpretation of the Trust Agreement entered into between the Oklahoma Turnpike Authority and the First National Bank and Trust Company of Oklahoma City, of January 1, 1966. On February 10, 1967, the Trustee Bank presented the Authority with a statement charging an acceptance fee of $44,450, pertaining to the 1966 Turnpike Bond Issue. The statement of the Trustee was not approved and on June 29, 1967, the Trustee charged the Authority's account and collected the fee. The said Bank has acted as Trustee to the Oklahoma Turnpike Authority since its inception and prior to 1966 had not charged any fee for any services performed as Trustee. Your first inquiry has two parts and they are, in essence, 1. Under Section 905 of the Trust Agreement is the Trustee entitled to a fee for services rendered as Trustee? 2. Does the Trustee have the right to debit the account of the Oklahoma Turnpike Authority in the Trustee Bank for the Trustee fee? Section 905 of the Trust Agreement provides: "Subject to the provisions of any contract between the Authority and the Trust relating to the compensation of the Trustee, the Authority shall, from the revenues of the Oklahoma Turnpike System, pay to the Trustee reasonable compensation for all services performed by it hereunder and also all its reasonable expenses, charges and other disbursements and those of its attorneys, agents and employees incurred in and about the administration and execution of the trusts hereby created and the performance of its powers and duties hereunder, and, from such revenues only, shall indemnify and save the Trustee harmless against any liabilities which it may incur in the exercise and performance of its powers and duties hereunder. If the Authority shall fail to make any payment required by this Section, the Trustee may make such payment from any moneys in its possession under the provisions of this Agreement and shall be entitled to a preference therefor over any of the bonds or coupons outstanding hereunder." The first sentence of Section 905 of the Trust Agreement is clear and explicit in its terms. It says the "Authority shall . . . pay to the Trustee reasonable compensation for all services performed, pursuant to the Trust Agreement. The significance to be placed on the language, "subject to the provisions of any contract between the authority and the trustee relating to the compensation of the Trustee", is that a separate contract may be entered into between the Authority and the Trustee fixing the compensation to be paid to the Trustee. The answer to part two of your first question must be ascertained from the second sentence of Section 905 of the Trust Agreement. We believe the effect of the second sentence is that following a mutual agreement by the Trustee and the Turnpike Authority as to the amount of the Trustee fee, the Trustee may debit the account of the Turnpike Authority for the amount of the fee only if the Turnpike Authority fails within a reasonable time to pay the said fee. Questions that may arise such as whether or not there is a subsequent contract between the Trustee and the Authority fixing the compensation to be paid the Trustee or providing no compensation is to be paid the trustee; that the Trustee has waived its rights to reasonable compensation by its actions or failure to act; and/or, if the Trustee is entitled to reasonable compensation, just what is reasonable compensation under the facts and circumstances, are questions which necessarily require the determination of factual issues which cannot be considered in this opinion. See Bogert, Trusts and Trustees, Section 980; 3 Scott on Trusts, Section 242.8; and 90 C.J.S. Trusts, Sections 161(b) and (c), 165. It is the opinion of the Attorney General that under Section 905 of the Trust Agreement the Trustee shall receive reasonable compensation for services performed pursuant to the Trust Agreement. It is the opinion of the Attorney General that the Trustee may debit the account of the Oklahoma Turnpike Authority only following the mutual agreement of the Trustee and Turnpike Authority as to the amount of the fee and the failure of the Authority to pay the same. Your second inquiry has four parts and they are: "1. Does the Trustee have the right to invest in Certificates of Deposit issued by the Trustee bank? "2. Is it necessary for the Trustee to give security for any money invested under the provisions of Sections 601 and 602 whether such investments are in certificates of deposit issued by the trustee bank or other qualified banks. "3. Does the Trustee have the duty to obtain the highest rate of interest available on any given date from Certificates of Deposit or other securities invested as of that date? "4. Is the Trustee liable or responsible for any loss resulting from investments made by it as Trustee?" Section 601 of the Trust Agreement provides in part: "All moneys received by the Authority under the provisions of this Agreement shall be deposited with the Trustee, shall be held in trust and applied only in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement, and shall not be subject to lien or attachment by any creditor of the Authority. "All moneys deposited with the Trustee shall be continuously secured, . . . ". . . provided, however, that it shall not be necessary . . . for the Trustee to give security for any moneys which shall be represented by obligations purchased under the provisions of this Article as an investment of such moneys." Section 602 of the Trust Agreement provides in part: "Section 602. Moneys held for the credit of the Construction Fund, . . . shall, as nearly as may be practicable, be invested and reinvested by the Trustee in Government obligations,. . . or in negotiable or non-negotiable certificates of deposit issued by any bank or trust company which is a member of the Federal Reserve System and has a combined capital and surplus aggregating not less than Twenty Million Dollars ($20,000,000), ". . . The Trustee shall sell at the best price obtainable or present for redemption any obligations so purchased whenever it shall be necessary so to do in order to provide moneys to meet any payment or transfer from any Fund or Account. Neither the trustee nor the Authority shall be liable or responsible for any loss resulting from any such investment. " We turn to the Oklahoma trust statutes, 60 O.S. 175.1 [60-175.1] (1961) et seq, which are applicable, to determine whether or not a corporation trustee (in this instance a national bank) may purchase its own certificates of deposit. 60 O.S. 175.9 [60-175.9] (1961), states in part that, "No corporate trustee shall lend trust funds to itself. . . ." If the dealing in its own certificates of deposit by a corporate trustee national bank can be considered a loan, then it necessarily follows that the Section 60 O.S.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hendricks v. Grant County Bank
1963 OK 50 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1963)
Finley v. Exchange Trust Co.
1938 OK 178 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1938)
Crume v. Rivers
1936 OK 539 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1936)
City of Aberdeen v. National Surety Co.
275 P. 62 (Washington Supreme Court, 1929)
Estate of Law
144 Pa. 499 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1891)
State v. McFetridge
54 N.W. 1 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Opinion No. 68-113 (1968) Ag, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-68-113-1968-ag-oklaag-1968.