Opinion No. 57-1108

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Opinion No. 57-1108

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports·Decided November 8, 1957·Published

Opinion

OPINION — AG — ** SALARIES — JUDGES ** THE AG HAS RECENTLY EXPRESSED THE VIEW THAT SEVERAL BILLS ENACTED BY THE 26TH OKLAHOMA LEGISLATURE, WHICH ARE SIMILAR TO SENATE BILL NO. 63 IN THIS RESPECT, ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL SPECIAL LAW, LOCAL LAWS. (ANNUAL SALARY, ADDITIONAL DUTIES, COURT FUND) CITE: 74 O.S. 250.2 [74-250.2], ARTICLE V, SECTION 32, ARTICLE V, SECTION 46, ARTICLE V, SECTION 59 (RICHARD M. HUFF)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION — AG — ** SALARIES — JUDGES ** THE AG HAS RECENTLY EXPRESSED THE VIEW THAT SEVERAL BILLS ENACTED BY THE 26TH OKLAHOMA LEGISLATURE, WHICH ARE SIMILAR TO SENATE BILL NO. 63 IN THIS RESPECT, ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL SPECIAL LAW, LOCAL LAWS. (ANNUAL SALARY, ADDITIONAL DUTIES, COURT FUND) CITE: 74 O.S. 250.2 [74-250.2], ARTICLE V, SECTION 32, ARTICLE V, SECTION 46, ARTICLE V, SECTION 59 (RICHARD M. HUFF)

Opinion No. 57-1108, (Okla. Super. Ct. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion No. 57-1108 (Opinion No. 57-1108) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.