Opinion No. 57-0719

CourtOklahoma Attorney General Reports
DecidedJuly 19, 1957
StatusPublished

This text of Opinion No. 57-0719 (Opinion No. 57-0719) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Opinion No. 57-0719, (Okla. Super. Ct. 1957).

Opinion

OPINION — AG — ** BREEDER PERMIT — PETS ** IT IS 'NOT' UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON TO KEEP A WILD ANIMAL. THE ABOVE IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS AN EXPRESSION OF OPINION POSSIBLE TORT LIABILITY OR NON LIABILITY FOR DAMAGES SUFFERED BY ANY PERSON FROM ANY WILD ANIMAL KEPT AS PET, SINCE WE HAVE ONLY CONSIDERED THE GAME AND FISH LAWS, AND SINCE THE MATTER OF TORT LIABILITY IS ONE OF WHICH THE INDIVIDUAL SHOULD CONSULT A PRIVATE ATTORNEY. (TORT, FUR BEARING ANIMALS, PERMIT, LICENSE) CITE: 29 O.S. 215 [29-215], 29 O.S. 314 [29-314] (JAMES P. GARRETT)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baker v. Beckwith
29 Ohio St. 314 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1876)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Opinion No. 57-0719, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-57-0719-oklaag-1957.