Opinion No. 57-0523

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports·Decided May 23, 1957·Published

Opinion

OPINION — AG — ** JUDGES — SALARIES ** HOUSE BILL NO. 833, HOUSE BILL NO. 647 SHOULD 'NOT' BE CONSTRUED AS BEARING ON THE VALIDITY OR CONTINUING EFFECT LAWS PROVIDING FOR ADDITIONAL SALARIES PAYABLE FROM COUNTY COURT FUND FOR JUDGES OF CERTAIN JUDICIAL DISTRICTS, WHICH LAWS ARE BASED ON POPULATION, ASSESSED VALUATION AND/OR OTHER CLASSIFICATION OF SAID DISTRICT, THAT IS, AS HELD IN ' BELL V. CRUM, 106 P.2d 518 ' (SALARY, JUDGES, ADDITIONAL DUTIES, COURT FUND, VALIDITY, CONSTITUTIONAL SPECIAL LAW, JUDICIAL DISTRICTS) CITE: 74 O.S. 250.2 [74-250.2], ARTICLE V, SECTION 32, ARTICLE V, SECTION 46, ARTICLE V, SECTION 59 (FRED HANSEN)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion No. 57-0523, (Okla. Super. Ct. 1957).

Opinion No. 57-0523 (Opinion No. 57-0523) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bell v. Crum
1940 OK 413 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1940)