Opinion No. 56-82 (1982)
This text of Opinion No. 56-82 (1982) (Opinion No. 56-82 (1982)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dear Senator Webster:
This opinion is in response to your question concerning residency requirements for candidates for the office of state senator in elections for which the state senatorial districts have not been established by reapportionment for one year prior to the next general election.
Article
Each senator shall be thirty years of age, and next before the day of his election shall have been a qualified voter of the state for three years and a resident of the district which he is chosen to represent for one year, if such district shall have been so long established, and if not, then of the district or districts from which the same shall have been taken.
The Judicial Commission Senate Plan was filed November 16, 1981, and, therefore, established the new districts less than one year prior to the next general election.
It is our interpretation that Article III, Section 6, means that a candidate would be qualified as to residency if he was a resident for one year next before the day of his election of any part of any former district or districts from which the new district was formed.
You have also asked concerning the applicability of State exrel. Gralike v. Walsh,
CONCLUSION
It is the opinion of this office that where state senatorial districts have not been established by reapportionment for one year next before the general election, under Article
The foregoing opinion, which I hereby approve, was prepared by my assistant, John C. Klaffenbach.
Very truly yours,
JOHN ASHCROFT Attorney General
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Opinion No. 56-82 (1982), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-56-82-1982-moag-1982.