Opinion No. 55-1228

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Opinion No. 55-1228

DecidedDecember 8, 1955

StatusPublished

This text of Opinion No. 55-1228 (Opinion No. 55-1228) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Opinion No. 55-1228, (Okla. Super. Ct. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION — AG — SUBJECT DISCUSSED IN OPINION: (1) IN THE ABSENCE BY THE STATE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, A COUNTY IS WITHOUT AUTHORITY TO PAY ANY ONE AS " WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION " (2) UNLESS AND UNTIL A WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION AWARD MADE BY THE STATE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION AGAINST A COUNTY HAS BEEN CONVERTED INTO A " JUDGEMENT " IN THE SAME MAY BE PAID FROM, BUT ONLY FROM, IN THE APPROPRIATION FOR " WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION AWARDS " IN THE " DEPARTMENT " OF " GENERAL GOVERNMENT " (WHERE THE LIABILITY FOR SUCH AWARD HAD NOT PREVIOUSLY BEEN INSURED AGAINST WITH THE STATE INSURANCE FUND OR OTHER INSURANCE CARRIER), AND, IN THE ABSENCE OF AN ITEM OF APPROPRIATION THEREFOR IN THE FORM OF COUNTY BUDGET PRESCRIBED BY THE STATE EXAMINER AND INSPECTOR, THE STATE EXAMINER AND INSPECTOR OR SHOULD ADD, AND DEFINE, SUCH AN ITEM OF APPROPRIATION IN SUCH BUDGET FORM. CITE: 62 O.S.H. 365.5, 68 O.S.H. 292, 85 O.S.H. 41, 85 O.S.H. 42, 85 O.S.H. 149 (JAMES C. HARKIN)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION — AG — SUBJECT DISCUSSED IN OPINION: (1) IN THE ABSENCE BY THE STATE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, A COUNTY IS WITHOUT AUTHORITY TO PAY ANY ONE AS " WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION " (2) UNLESS AND UNTIL A WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION AWARD MADE BY THE STATE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION AGAINST A COUNTY HAS BEEN CONVERTED INTO A " JUDGEMENT " IN THE SAME MAY BE PAID FROM, BUT ONLY FROM, IN THE APPROPRIATION FOR " WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION AWARDS " IN THE " DEPARTMENT " OF " GENERAL GOVERNMENT " (WHERE THE LIABILITY FOR SUCH AWARD HAD NOT PREVIOUSLY BEEN INSURED AGAINST WITH THE STATE INSURANCE FUND OR OTHER INSURANCE CARRIER), AND, IN THE ABSENCE OF AN ITEM OF APPROPRIATION THEREFOR IN THE FORM OF COUNTY BUDGET PRESCRIBED BY THE STATE EXAMINER AND INSPECTOR, THE STATE EXAMINER AND INSPECTOR OR SHOULD ADD, AND DEFINE, SUCH AN ITEM OF APPROPRIATION IN SUCH BUDGET FORM. CITE: 62 O.S.H. 365.5, 68 O.S.H. 292, 85 O.S.H. 41, 85 O.S.H. 42, 85 O.S.H. 149 (JAMES C. HARKIN)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Opinion No. 55-1228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-55-1228-oklaag-1955.