Opinion No. 54-1207

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Opinion No. 54-1207

DecidedDecember 7, 1954

StatusPublished

This text of Opinion No. 54-1207 (Opinion No. 54-1207) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Opinion No. 54-1207, (Okla. Super. Ct. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION — AG — AN OPINION DEALING WITH A PURCHASE ORDER SECURING MACHINES ISSUED AND WAS NUMBERED. THE MACHINES WERE DELIVERED BY THE VENDOR. THE FACE OF THE CLAIM BORE THE CORRECT TOTAL OF THE TWO BILLS ENCLOSED, AND BOTH BILLS WERE LISTED IN THE APPROPRIATE PLACE ON THE FACE OF THE BILL (INVOICE). HOWEVER, A CLERICAL ERROR OCCURRED WHEN THE REVERSE OF THE CLAIM WAS COMPLETE. . . . . THE APPROPRIATION YEAR LAPSED. DO WE PAY? — SEE OPINION CITE: 62 O.S.H. 9.1, 62 O.S.H. 41.15, 62 O.S.H. 41.21, ARTICLE V, SECTION 55 (J. H. JOHNSON)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION — AG — AN OPINION DEALING WITH A PURCHASE ORDER SECURING MACHINES ISSUED AND WAS NUMBERED. THE MACHINES WERE DELIVERED BY THE VENDOR. THE FACE OF THE CLAIM BORE THE CORRECT TOTAL OF THE TWO BILLS ENCLOSED, AND BOTH BILLS WERE LISTED IN THE APPROPRIATE PLACE ON THE FACE OF THE BILL (INVOICE). HOWEVER, A CLERICAL ERROR OCCURRED WHEN THE REVERSE OF THE CLAIM WAS COMPLETE. . . . . THE APPROPRIATION YEAR LAPSED. DO WE PAY? — SEE OPINION CITE: 62 O.S.H. 9.1, 62 O.S.H. 41.15, 62 O.S.H. 41.21, ARTICLE V, SECTION 55 (J. H. JOHNSON)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Opinion No. 54-1207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-54-1207-oklaag-1954.