Opinion No. 54-0515

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Opinion No. 54-0515

DecidedMay 15, 1954

StatusPublished

This text of Opinion No. 54-0515 (Opinion No. 54-0515) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Opinion No. 54-0515, (Okla. Super. Ct. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION — AG — THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF STEPHENS COUNTY, DOES NOT HAVE THE LEGAL AUTHORITY TO FILE A LEGAL ACCUSATION IN WRITING IN THE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE REMOVAL OF MEMBERS OF THE SCHOOL BOARD. THERE CAN BE NO QUESTION BUT THAT A DULY EMPANELED GRAND JURY WOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO FILE A LEGAL ACCUSATION FOR THE OUSTER FROM OFFICE OF SCHOOL BOARD MEMBERS. (MALIFICENCE, ILLEGAL ACTIVITY, CRIMINAL ACTION) CITE: 22 O.S. 1181 [22-1181], 22 O.S. 1182 [22-1182], 22 O.S. 1194 [22-1194] (NEGLECT, MALADMINISTRATION, CORRUPTION, EXTORTION), OPINION NO. APRIL 22, 1932 — WATSON (OWEN J. WATTS)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION — AG — THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF STEPHENS COUNTY, DOES NOT HAVE THE LEGAL AUTHORITY TO FILE A LEGAL ACCUSATION IN WRITING IN THE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE REMOVAL OF MEMBERS OF THE SCHOOL BOARD. THERE CAN BE NO QUESTION BUT THAT A DULY EMPANELED GRAND JURY WOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO FILE A LEGAL ACCUSATION FOR THE OUSTER FROM OFFICE OF SCHOOL BOARD MEMBERS. (MALIFICENCE, ILLEGAL ACTIVITY, CRIMINAL ACTION) CITE: 22 O.S. 1181 [22-1181], 22 O.S. 1182 [22-1182], 22 O.S. 1194 [22-1194] (NEGLECT, MALADMINISTRATION, CORRUPTION, EXTORTION), OPINION NO. APRIL 22, 1932 — WATSON (OWEN J. WATTS)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Opinion No. 54-0515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-54-0515-oklaag-1954.