Opinion No. 54-0325

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports·Decided March 25, 1954·Published

Opinion

OPINION — AG — QUESTION(1): IS SUSPENSION OF SENTENCE BARRED BY THE FACT THAT " DEFENDANT HAS PREVIOUSLY BEEN CHARGED IN A COURT NOT OF RECORD, POSTED A BOND AND FAILED TO APPEAR BACK TO DEFEND THE CHARGE ? ", QUESTION(2): IS SUSPENSION OF SENTENCE BARRED BY THE FACT THAT " DEFENDANT HAS PREVIOUSLY BEEN CONVICTED OF A MISDEMEANOR NOT INVOLVING MORAL TURPITUDE ? " — THE AG CANNOT DO OTHER THAN ADVISE THAT ANY PREVIOUS CONVICTION OF CRIME UNDER A STATE LAW (NOT A MUNICIPAL ORDINANCE) IN ANY COURT, WHETHER OF OKLAHOMA OR SOME OTHER STATE, WILL OPERATE AS A BAR TO SUSPENSION UNDER ABOVE STATUTE. (FORFEITURE OF BOND) CITE: 22 O.S. 991 [22-991] (FRED HANSEN)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion No. 54-0325, (Okla. Super. Ct. 1954).

Opinion No. 54-0325 (Opinion No. 54-0325) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.