Opinion No. 53-0912

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Opinion No. 53-0912

DecidedSeptember 12, 1953

StatusPublished

This text of Opinion No. 53-0912 (Opinion No. 53-0912) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Opinion No. 53-0912, (Okla. Super. Ct. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION — AG — WHERE THE PERSON WHO WAS ELECTED AS TOWN TREASURER OF AN INCORPORATED TOWN FOR THE TERM BEGINNING ON THE FIRST MONDAY IN MAY, 1947, DULY QUALIFIED FOR SUCH OFFICE BY FILING THE OATHS REQUIRED BY LAW AND AN OFFICIAL BOND AS REQUIRED OR PROVIDED BY LAW, AND, BECAUSE NO ONE EVER FILED FOR SUCH OFFICE IN THE MEANTIME, HAS CONTINUED TO ACT AS TOWN TREASURER OF SUCH TOWN, SUCH PERSON IS THE DULY ELECTED, QUALIFIED AND ACTING TOWN TREASURER OF SUCH TOWN, AND THE COUNTY CLERK AND COUNTY TREASURER OF THE COUNTY IN WHICH THE TOWN IS LOCATED WOULD NOT BE AUTHORIZED TO WITHHOLD ANY MONEYS PAYABLE TO THE TOWN TREASURER OF SUCH TOWN MERELY BECAUSE SUCH PERSON HAS NOT FILED A NEW BOND SPECIFICALLY COVERING THE TERM OF OFFICE WHICH ORDINARILY WOULD HAVE BEGUN ON THE FIRST MONDAY IN MAY, 1953. (MUNICIPALITY, SURETY BOND, TERMS OF OFFICE) CITE: 11 O.S. 23 [11-23](C), 19 O.S. 131 [19-131], ARTICLE XXIII, SECTION 10 (JAMES C. HARKIN)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION — AG — WHERE THE PERSON WHO WAS ELECTED AS TOWN TREASURER OF AN INCORPORATED TOWN FOR THE TERM BEGINNING ON THE FIRST MONDAY IN MAY, 1947, DULY QUALIFIED FOR SUCH OFFICE BY FILING THE OATHS REQUIRED BY LAW AND AN OFFICIAL BOND AS REQUIRED OR PROVIDED BY LAW, AND, BECAUSE NO ONE EVER FILED FOR SUCH OFFICE IN THE MEANTIME, HAS CONTINUED TO ACT AS TOWN TREASURER OF SUCH TOWN, SUCH PERSON IS THE DULY ELECTED, QUALIFIED AND ACTING TOWN TREASURER OF SUCH TOWN, AND THE COUNTY CLERK AND COUNTY TREASURER OF THE COUNTY IN WHICH THE TOWN IS LOCATED WOULD NOT BE AUTHORIZED TO WITHHOLD ANY MONEYS PAYABLE TO THE TOWN TREASURER OF SUCH TOWN MERELY BECAUSE SUCH PERSON HAS NOT FILED A NEW BOND SPECIFICALLY COVERING THE TERM OF OFFICE WHICH ORDINARILY WOULD HAVE BEGUN ON THE FIRST MONDAY IN MAY, 1953. (MUNICIPALITY, SURETY BOND, TERMS OF OFFICE) CITE: 11 O.S. 23 [11-23](C), 19 O.S. 131 [19-131], ARTICLE XXIII, SECTION 10 (JAMES C. HARKIN)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Opinion No. 53-0912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-53-0912-oklaag-1953.