Opinion No. 52-0920

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Opinion No. 52-0920

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports·Decided September 20, 1952·Published

Opinion

OPINION — AG — ** BUILDING — BONDS ** THUS, IF THE USE TO WHICH THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD PROPOSES TO PUT SAID FRAME BUILDING BRINGS IT WITHIN THE CLASSIFICATION OF FACILITIES "WHICH CANNOT BE CONSTRUCTED FROM REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS" (UNDER THE RULE SET OUT IN SECT. 4 OF THE BILL), WE BELIEVE SAID APPROPRIATION MAY BE USED TO PURCHASE SAME. WHETHER OR NOT SAID BUILDING COMES WITHIN SAID CLASSIFICATION IS A QUESTION OF FACT. THE BOARD WOULD HAVE NO AUTHORITY TO BUY SAID BUILDING UNLESS THE OWNER THEREOF FURNISHED CLEAR TITLE THERETO. (PURCHASE) CITE: 74 O.S. 351 [74-351] (MAINARD KENNERLY)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION — AG — ** BUILDING — BONDS ** THUS, IF THE USE TO WHICH THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD PROPOSES TO PUT SAID FRAME BUILDING BRINGS IT WITHIN THE CLASSIFICATION OF FACILITIES "WHICH CANNOT BE CONSTRUCTED FROM REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS" (UNDER THE RULE SET OUT IN SECT. 4 OF THE BILL), WE BELIEVE SAID APPROPRIATION MAY BE USED TO PURCHASE SAME. WHETHER OR NOT SAID BUILDING COMES WITHIN SAID CLASSIFICATION IS A QUESTION OF FACT. THE BOARD WOULD HAVE NO AUTHORITY TO BUY SAID BUILDING UNLESS THE OWNER THEREOF FURNISHED CLEAR TITLE THERETO. (PURCHASE) CITE: 74 O.S. 351 [74-351] (MAINARD KENNERLY)

Opinion No. 52-0920, (Okla. Super. Ct. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion No. 52-0920 (Opinion No. 52-0920) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.