Opinion No. 52-0920

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Opinion No. 52-0920

DecidedSeptember 20, 1952

StatusPublished

This text of Opinion No. 52-0920 (Opinion No. 52-0920) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Opinion No. 52-0920, (Okla. Super. Ct. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION — AG — ** BUILDING — BONDS ** THUS, IF THE USE TO WHICH THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD PROPOSES TO PUT SAID FRAME BUILDING BRINGS IT WITHIN THE CLASSIFICATION OF FACILITIES "WHICH CANNOT BE CONSTRUCTED FROM REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS" (UNDER THE RULE SET OUT IN SECT. 4 OF THE BILL), WE BELIEVE SAID APPROPRIATION MAY BE USED TO PURCHASE SAME. WHETHER OR NOT SAID BUILDING COMES WITHIN SAID CLASSIFICATION IS A QUESTION OF FACT. THE BOARD WOULD HAVE NO AUTHORITY TO BUY SAID BUILDING UNLESS THE OWNER THEREOF FURNISHED CLEAR TITLE THERETO. (PURCHASE) CITE: 74 O.S. 351 [74-351] (MAINARD KENNERLY)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION — AG — ** BUILDING — BONDS ** THUS, IF THE USE TO WHICH THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD PROPOSES TO PUT SAID FRAME BUILDING BRINGS IT WITHIN THE CLASSIFICATION OF FACILITIES "WHICH CANNOT BE CONSTRUCTED FROM REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS" (UNDER THE RULE SET OUT IN SECT. 4 OF THE BILL), WE BELIEVE SAID APPROPRIATION MAY BE USED TO PURCHASE SAME. WHETHER OR NOT SAID BUILDING COMES WITHIN SAID CLASSIFICATION IS A QUESTION OF FACT. THE BOARD WOULD HAVE NO AUTHORITY TO BUY SAID BUILDING UNLESS THE OWNER THEREOF FURNISHED CLEAR TITLE THERETO. (PURCHASE) CITE: 74 O.S. 351 [74-351] (MAINARD KENNERLY)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Opinion No. 52-0920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-52-0920-oklaag-1952.