Opinion No. 52-0621 Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports·Decided June 21, 1952·Published

Opinion

** PENALTIES — OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION ** A COUNTY ATTORNEY (DISTRICT ATTORNEY) IS 'NOT' AUTHORIZED TO COMPROMISE A CLAIM FOR THE PENALTIES PRESCRIBED IN 18 O.S. 1.23 [18-1.23] ("BUSINESS CORPORATION ACT"), FOR THE OWNING OR HOLDING, BY OR FOR A CORPORATION OF REAL ESTATE IN VIOLATION OF 18 O.S. 20 [18-20], 18 O.S. 21 [18-21] (RURAL LAND, SETTLED FOR LESS THAN AMOUNT DUE, REAL ESTATE, DOMESTICATION) CITE: ARTICLE V, SECTION 53, 18 O.S. 1.21 [18-1.21], 18 O.S. 1.24 [18-1.24] 18 O.S. 1.23 [18-1.23] (JAMES C. HARKIN)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion No. 52-0621 Ag, (Okla. Super. Ct. 1952).

Opinion No. 52-0621 Ag (Opinion No. 52-0621 Ag) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Acheson v. Miller
18 Ohio St. 1 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1849)