Opinion No. 52-0119 Ag

CourtOklahoma Attorney General Reports
DecidedJanuary 19, 1952
StatusPublished

This text of Opinion No. 52-0119 Ag (Opinion No. 52-0119 Ag) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Opinion No. 52-0119 Ag, (Okla. Super. Ct. 1952).

Opinion

** STENOGRAPHER — AUTHORITY — COURT CLERK TO FURNISH ** QUESTION: DOES THE COUNTY JUDGE, IN THE ABSENCE OF A COUNTY COURT STENOGRAPHER, HAVE A RIGHT TO DEMAND THAT THE COURT CLERK OF THE DISTRICT COURT OR HIS DEPUTY, DO HIS (COUNT JUDGE) STENOGRAPHIC WORK? ANSWER: NEGATIVE (SALARY/DUAL) CITE: 19 O.S. 179.1 [19-179.1]/19 O.S. 179.7 [19-179.7] /19 O.S. 222 [19-222]/20 O.S. 311 [20-311]/OPINION NO. NOVEMBER 3, 1950 — CAMPBELL (JAMES P. GARRETT)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Opinion No. 52-0119 Ag, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-52-0119-ag-oklaag-1952.