Opinion No. 51-0816

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Opinion No. 51-0816

DecidedAugust 16, 1951

StatusPublished

This text of Opinion No. 51-0816 (Opinion No. 51-0816) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Opinion No. 51-0816, (Okla. Super. Ct. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION — AG — ** INDIGENT — COURT APPOINTED ATTORNEY — FEES ** WE DULY RECEIVED YOUR LETTER . . . LEGISLATURE AMENDING 22 O.S. 1271 [22-1271] BY INCREASING THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT WHICH MAY BE ALLOWED TO AN ATTORNEY APPOINTED TO REPRESENT A PAUPER DEFENDANT FROM $25.00 TO $100.00. YOU STATE THAT A QUESTION HAS ARISEN AS TO WHETHER SUCH COMPENSATION SHOULD BE PAID FROM THE COURT FUND OR FROM THE GENERAL FUND OF THE COUNTY ? — COURT FUND (COUNTY COMMISSIONERS) CITE: 62 O.S. 323 [62-323], 22 O.S. 1271 [22-1271] (SAM H. LATTIMORE)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION — AG — ** INDIGENT — COURT APPOINTED ATTORNEY — FEES ** WE DULY RECEIVED YOUR LETTER . . . LEGISLATURE AMENDING 22 O.S. 1271 [22-1271] BY INCREASING THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT WHICH MAY BE ALLOWED TO AN ATTORNEY APPOINTED TO REPRESENT A PAUPER DEFENDANT FROM $25.00 TO $100.00. YOU STATE THAT A QUESTION HAS ARISEN AS TO WHETHER SUCH COMPENSATION SHOULD BE PAID FROM THE COURT FUND OR FROM THE GENERAL FUND OF THE COUNTY ? — COURT FUND (COUNTY COMMISSIONERS) CITE: 62 O.S. 323 [62-323], 22 O.S. 1271 [22-1271] (SAM H. LATTIMORE)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Opinion No. 51-0816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-51-0816-oklaag-1951.