Opinion No. 51-0724

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Opinion No. 51-0724

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports·Decided July 24, 1951·Published

Opinion

OPINION — AG — ** STATE BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY — BEAUTY SCHOOL ** THAT THE MARKED PORTION OF RULE 29 SHOULD BE TREATED AND CONSIDERED AS HAVING SUPERSEDED BY THE PASSAGE OF SENATE BILL NO. 158; AND THAT SAID RULE 29 SHOULD BE MODIFIED ACCORDINGLY, SO AS TO PERMIT THE ACCEPTANCE OF SAID APPLICATION FOR ENROLLMENT IN THE " ADVANCED OPERATOR " COURSE IN THE CASE SET OUT IN YOUR LETTER. (COURSES, LICENSE, REGISTRATION, EXAMINATION, INSTRUCTOR, STUDENT, TRAINING) CITE: 59 O.S. 199.7 [59-199.7] (MAINARD KENNERLY)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION — AG — ** STATE BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY — BEAUTY SCHOOL ** THAT THE MARKED PORTION OF RULE 29 SHOULD BE TREATED AND CONSIDERED AS HAVING SUPERSEDED BY THE PASSAGE OF SENATE BILL NO. 158; AND THAT SAID RULE 29 SHOULD BE MODIFIED ACCORDINGLY, SO AS TO PERMIT THE ACCEPTANCE OF SAID APPLICATION FOR ENROLLMENT IN THE " ADVANCED OPERATOR " COURSE IN THE CASE SET OUT IN YOUR LETTER. (COURSES, LICENSE, REGISTRATION, EXAMINATION, INSTRUCTOR, STUDENT, TRAINING) CITE: 59 O.S. 199.7 [59-199.7] (MAINARD KENNERLY)

Opinion No. 51-0724, (Okla. Super. Ct. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion No. 51-0724 (Opinion No. 51-0724) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.