Opinion No. 50-76 (1976)
This text of Opinion No. 50-76 (1976) (Opinion No. 50-76 (1976)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mr. Alfred C. Sikes, Director Department of Consumer Affairs, Regulation and Licensing 505 Missouri Boulevard Jefferson City, Missouri 65101
Dear Mr. Sikes:
This is in response to your request for an opinion on the following question:
"Does the phrase `. . . cut and dress the hair . . .' Section
328.010 RSMo 1969 include the same authorized practices as `arranging, dressing, curling, singeing, waving, permanent waving, cleansing, cutting, bleaching, tinting, coloring or similar work on the hair of any person by any means. . .' Section 329.020 RSMo 1969. . . ."
The occupation of "barber" is defined by Section
However, nothing in this opinion should be construed as holding that a barber may practice under the name "cosmetologist" or that a cosmetologist may practice under the name "barber."
Opinion No. 85, dated April 11, 1934; Opinion Letter No. 35, dated October 9, 1961; and Opinion Letter No. 158, dated April 3, 1962 are withdrawn.
CONCLUSION
It is the opinion of this office that a licensed barber may arrange, dress, curl, singe, wave, permanent wave, cleanse, cut, bleach, tint, or color hair as a normal incident of dressing hair.
The foregoing opinion, which I hereby approve, was prepared by my assistant, Charles A. Blackmar.
Very truly yours,
JOHN C. DANFORTH Attorney General
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Opinion No. 50-76 (1976), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-50-76-1976-moag-1976.