Opinion No. 48-0225

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Opinion No. 48-0225

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports·Decided February 25, 1948·Published

Opinion

OPINION — AG — ** TRANSFERRED STUDENTS — SCHOOL — APPORTIONED FUNDS ** (1) WHERE A SCHOOL DISTRICT TRANSFERS PUPILS TO ANOTHER SCHOOL DISTRICT OR DISTRICTS, THE COUNTY TREASURER SHOULD 'CEASE' APPORTIONING THE MONEYS OF THE TRANSFERRING DISTRICT TO THE DISTRICT OR DISTRICTS TO WHICH THE PUPILS WERE TRANSFERRED (AS PROVIDED IN 70 O.S. 1037.13 [70-1037.13], AS AMENDED) WHEN THE AMOUNT SO APPORTIONED EQUALS THE AMOUNT APPROPRIATED IN THE BUDGET OF SAID TRANSFERRING DISTRICT FOR TRANSFER FEES. (2) WE (A.G.) EXPRESS NO OPINION AS TO WHETHER OR NOT ANY SURPLUS FUNDS MAY BE USED IN THE MAKING OF SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION FOR SCHOOL DISTRICTS WHICH HAVE TRANSFERRED ALL OF THEIR PUPILS AND WHICH DO NOT MAINTAIN A SCHOOL. (AVERAGE DAILY ATTENDANCE, COUNTY EXCISE BOARD, FUNDS, TRANSFER FEES) CITE: OPINION NO. FEBRUARY 18, 1948 — HODGE, 70 O.S. 1037.14 [70-1037.14], 70 O.S. 1037.15 [70-1037.15], 70 O.S. 1037.13 [70-1037.13], 70 O.S. 1037 [70-1037] 70 O.S. 1037.2 [70-1037.2], 70 O.S. 1037.7 [70-1037.7], 70 O.S. 1037.1 [70-1037.1](A), 70 O.S. 1037.12 [70-1037.12] (RICHARD M. HUFF)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION — AG — ** TRANSFERRED STUDENTS — SCHOOL — APPORTIONED FUNDS ** (1) WHERE A SCHOOL DISTRICT TRANSFERS PUPILS TO ANOTHER SCHOOL DISTRICT OR DISTRICTS, THE COUNTY TREASURER SHOULD 'CEASE' APPORTIONING THE MONEYS OF THE TRANSFERRING DISTRICT TO THE DISTRICT OR DISTRICTS TO WHICH THE PUPILS WERE TRANSFERRED (AS PROVIDED IN 70 O.S. 1037.13 [70-1037.13], AS AMENDED) WHEN THE AMOUNT SO APPORTIONED EQUALS THE AMOUNT APPROPRIATED IN THE BUDGET OF SAID TRANSFERRING DISTRICT FOR TRANSFER FEES. (2) WE (A.G.) EXPRESS NO OPINION AS TO WHETHER OR NOT ANY SURPLUS FUNDS MAY BE USED IN THE MAKING OF SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION FOR SCHOOL DISTRICTS WHICH HAVE TRANSFERRED ALL OF THEIR PUPILS AND WHICH DO NOT MAINTAIN A SCHOOL. (AVERAGE DAILY ATTENDANCE, COUNTY EXCISE BOARD, FUNDS, TRANSFER FEES) CITE: OPINION NO. FEBRUARY 18, 1948 — HODGE, 70 O.S. 1037.14 [70-1037.14], 70 O.S. 1037.15 [70-1037.15], 70 O.S. 1037.13 [70-1037.13], 70 O.S. 1037 [70-1037] 70 O.S. 1037.2 [70-1037.2], 70 O.S. 1037.7 [70-1037.7], 70 O.S. 1037.1 [70-1037.1](A), 70 O.S. 1037.12 [70-1037.12] (RICHARD M. HUFF)

Opinion No. 48-0225, (Okla. Super. Ct. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion No. 48-0225 (Opinion No. 48-0225) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.