Opinion No. 217-76 (1976)

CourtMissouri Attorney General Reports
DecidedNovember 4, 1976
StatusPublished

This text of Opinion No. 217-76 (1976) (Opinion No. 217-76 (1976)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Opinion No. 217-76 (1976), (Mo. 1976).

Opinion

FILED 217

Honorable Donald L. Manford State Senator, 8th District Room 334, Capitol Building Jefferson City, Missouri 65101

Dear Senator Manford:

This letter is in response to your opinion request in which you ask whether a probate ex officio magistrate judge may also serve as an appointed city judge for compensation in a city of the fourth class.

While there may be other objections to such an arrangement, it is our view that Section 24 of Article V of the Missouri Constitution is an applicable prohibition. This is because Section 24 of Article V provides that no judge or magistrate shall receive any other or additional compensation for any public service. Therefore, in direct answer to your question, it would be a violation of such section for a judge to receive additional compensation for any public service. Since service as a municipal judge constitutes a public service such an arrangement falls within the prohibition of the Constitution.

Very truly yours,

JOHN C. DANFORTH Attorney General

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Opinion No. 217-76 (1976), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-217-76-1976-moag-1976.