Opinion No. (2007)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports·Decided March 9, 2007·Published

Opinion

Dear District Attorney Gibson:

This office has received your request for an official Attorney General Opinion in which you ask, in effect, the following questions:

1. What is the role of the County Excise Board in reviewing and approving or disapproving a budget submitted by the Board of County Commissioners in a county that has not adopted the Budget Board Act?

2. Is there a conflict between 19 O.S. 2001, § 1414[ 19-1414] (a part of the Budget Board Act) and 68 O.S. 2001, § 3007[68-3007](2) (a part of the County Budget Laws)?

Your questions involve the role of a county excise board to approve, amend or reduce items in a proposed county budget, and whether the excise board functions differently when a county operates through a county budget board created pursuant to 19 O.S. 2001, §§ 1401-1421[19-1401-1421] [hereinafter Budget Board Act], as opposed to procedures required in counties that have not elected to follow the Budget Board Act, i.e., "non-budget board counties." Non-budget board counties develop and approve county budgets pursuant to 68 O.S. 2001, §§ 3001[68-3001] — 3033 [hereinafter County Budget Laws]. Is the power or authority of a county excise board different in budget board counties than it is in non-budget board counties? Based on our analysis, we conclude the powers of county excise boards in budget board counties are different from powers of such boards in non-budget board counties. There is no conflict to be resolved between the Budget Board Act and the County Budget Laws. The statutes are different, and the excise board's statutory power in a budget board county does not apply in a non-budget board county, or vice versa.

APPLICABLE STATUTES AND COURT DECISIONS
I.
NON-BUDGET BOARD COUNTIES
The traditional method of developing and approving a county budget, followed by a majority of counties in Oklahoma,1 is set out in the County Budget Laws. The principal officers of a county, together with all cities, towns and boards of education within the county, annually prepare a report of their respective earnings, income and cost of operation for the previous year and an estimate of their expected needs for the ensuing fiscal year, and on or by the first Monday in July submit such report and estimate of needs to the commission or board that has the duty to report such information to the county excise board. 68 O.S. 2001, § 3004[68-3004];Summey v. Tisdale, 658 P.2d 464, 466 (Okla. 1982). Since the board of county commissioners is the body charged with the duty to "superintend the fiscal concerns of the county," the county commissioners prepare an estimate of needs and financial statement, and publish it in a county newspaper of general circulation. 19 O.S. 2001, § 345[19-345]. The county commissioners must submit an estimate of needs and financial statement for the county to the county excise board by August 17 of each year. 68 O.S. Supp.2006, § 3002(D). Estimates of needs and a financial statement must be filed with the excise board each year by August 22 for incorporated towns, by August 27 for incorporated cities, and by October 1 for school districts. Id.

The county excise board must meet with the principal officers of the county prior to July 1 of each year to develop a proposed budget for county offices. 19 O.S. Supp.2006, § 180.65(E). The county excise board is a three-person board, consisting of one member appointed by the Oklahoma Tax Commission, one member appointed by the board of county commissioners and one member appointed by the district judge or by a majority of the district judges in the county. 68 O.S. 2001, §§ 2861[68-2861](A), (B); 3005.1(A). The excise board must meet at the county seat no later than July 1 of each year and continuing thereafter as needed. Id. § 3006.

Pending approval of final budget figures, the excise board may make temporary appropriations to the various political subdivisions. 68 O.S. Supp.2006, § 3020(A). The excise board may also make supplemental or additional appropriations to a given political subdivision upon a showing of need, subject to the amount of revenues available for the year. Id. § 3021. While the board of county commissioners is empowered to make recommendations on the total amount of funds that may be used for salaries within the various county offices, the approval of funding for such offices "shall continue to be the responsibility of the county excise board." 19 O.S. Supp.2006, § 180.65(D).

The powers and duties of a county excise board in a non-budget board county are set forth in 68 O.S. 2001, §§ 3006-3007[68-3006-3007]. Section 3006 provides for the organization of the excise board, declaring:

In its functioning it is hereby declared an agency of the state, as a part of the system of checks and balances required by the Constitution, and as such it is empowered to require adequate and accurate reporting of finances and expenditures for all budget and supplemental purposes, charged with the duty of requiring adequate provision for performance of mandatory constitutional and statutory governmental functions within the means available, but it shall have no authority thereafter to deny any appropriation for a lawful purpose if within the income and revenue provided.

Id. Section 3007 sets forth the budgetary powers of county excise boards. In particular, subsection (2), about which you ask, provides the excise board shall:

(2) Examine specifically the several items and amounts stated in the estimate of needs, and if any be contained therein not authorized by law or that may be contrary to law, or in excess of needs, as determined by the excise board, said items shall be ordered stricken and disregarded. If the amount as to any lawful item exceeds the amount authorized by law, it shall be ordered reduced to that extent; otherwise, the excise board joins in responsibility therefor.

Id. (emphasis added).

The issue of whether, or to what extent, a county excise board has power to modify or deny funding to a particular entity was recently decided by the Oklahoma Court of Appeals in Board of CountyCommissioners. v. Excise Board of Sequoyah, 132 P.3d 615 (Okla.Civ.App. 2005) [hereinafter Sequoyah County]. In Sequoyah County the board of county commissioners had proposed funding for a 911 trust authority and a jail trust authority, neither of which had submitted an estimate of needs. Id. at 616. The county excise board turned down the request for funding of these two trusts, instead allocating the amounts requested to the county treasurer, county clerk, court clerk and sheriff's office, thereby increasing the funding for these offices. Id. A district court held the action of the excise board unlawful. Id. In reversing the district court's judgment, the court in Sequoyah County

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion No. (2007), (Okla. Super. Ct. 2007).

Opinion No. (2007) (Opinion No. (2007)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cox v. Dawson
1996 OK 11 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1996)
Summey v. Tisdale
1982 OK 133 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1982)
Rapp v. Oklahoma Tax Commission
1933 OK 621 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1933)
Board of County Commissioners v. Excise Board of Sequoyah County
2006 OK CIV APP 28 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 2005)