Opinion No. (2003)
This text of Opinion No. (2003) (Opinion No. (2003)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Honorable Jim Froelker State Representative, District 111 State Capitol Building, Room 109B Jefferson City, MO 65101-6806
Dear Representative Froelker:
You have submitted a request for an opinion from this office whether a member of the board of directors of the Sullivan Fire Protection District may hold any lucrative office or employment under this state or any political subdivision of this state while serving as a member of the board of directors of that fire protection district. In the information you submitted, you have stated that the Sullivan Fire Protection District includes portions of Franklin, Washington, and Crawford Counties, that none of those counties have a charter form of government, and that none have a population in excess of 900,000 inhabitants.
Section
[T]o any county of the first or second class not having more than nine hundred thousand inhabitants which borders any three first class counties; nor shall this section apply to any first class county without a charter form of government which adjoins both a first class county with a charter form of government with at least nine hundred thousand inhabitants, and adjoins at least four other counties.
Franklin County qualifies under the first quoted exception in that it is a county of the first class with fewer than 900,000 inhabitants that borders three first class counties, Jefferson County, St. Louis County, and St. Charles County. Franklin County also qualifies under the second quoted exception in that it is a first class county without a charter form of government which adjoins a first class county with a charter form of government with at least 900,000 inhabitants (St. Louis County) and adjoins at least four counties, the three previously mentioned, plus Warren, Gasconade, Crawford, and Washington.
The purpose of statutory construction is to ascertain the legislature's intent. Budding v. SSM Healthcare Sys.,
Section
Very truly yours,
JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON Attorney General
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Opinion No. (2003), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-2003-moag-2003.