Opinion No. (1998)

Nebraska Attorney General Reports·Decided February 4, 1998·Published

Opinion

REQUESTED BY: Douglas D. Christensen Commissioner of Education You have requested an opinion from this office regarding the extent of the State Board of Education's authority to approve a pending merger application of two educational service units. Specifically, you have asked us to determine whether Neb. Rev. Stat. § 79-1202, § 79-1203, and § 79-1209 permit the State Board of Education to approve the merger petition with an effective date prior to July 1, 1998.

The merger petition now before the State Board of Education was submitted by Educational Service Unit ["ESU"] #12 and ESU #13 pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 79-1207 (Supp. 1997), which permits ESU boundaries to be changed by petitioning the State Board of Education. The two ESUs seek to merge into a new ESU.See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 79-1209(4) (Supp. 1997). In order to facilitate planning and staffing decisions, the ESUs seek to have the merger become effective as of March 1, 1998.

Pertinent Statutes

Statutes governing your inquiry are set forth in Nebraska's "Educational Service Units Act," Neb. Rev. Stat. § 79-1201 to § 79-1239 (1996 Supp. 1997). During the 1997 legislative session, several of the statutes in the Act were amended to read as follows:

Nineteen educational service units are established. The official name of such units shall be Educational Service Unit No. _____ of the State of Nebraska, and the individual number of each unit shall be determined by the State Board of Education as provided in this section and section 79-1203. For [ESUs] existing on July 1, 1998, the number of the unit shall remain the same. For [ESUs] created by merger after July 1, 1998, the number of the unit shall be the number of one of the [ESUs] dissolving into the new [ESU]. For all other [ESUs] created after July 1, 1998, the number shall be any number not otherwise assigned to an existing [ESU].

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 79-1202 (Supp. 1997) (emphasis supplied). The statute specifically enumerating, and setting boundaries for, the existing 19 educational service units, was also amended and now provides that

[u]ntil July 1, 1998, the number of the educational service units established pursuant to section 79-1202 shall be [as set forth in the statute].

. . .

On and after July 1, 1998, the identification numbers of the educational service units shall be as provided in this section unless the boundaries of [ESUs] are changed pursuant to a reorganization under sections 79-1206 to 79-1211.1 The number of a reorganized [ESU] shall be determined under 79-1202.

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 79-1203 (Supp. 1997).

Standard of Review

In construing the applicable statutes, we follow several well-established rules of statutory construction. First, we must determine and give effect to the Legislature's purpose and intent as ascertained from the entire language of the statute in its plain and ordinary meaning. Nickel v. Saline County SchoolDist. No. 163, 251 Neb. 762, 559 N.W.2d 480 (1997). Next, resort to the legislative history of the statutes is not required when the statutory text is plain, direct, and unambiguous.Metropolitan Util. Dist. of Omaha v. Balka, 252 Neb. 172,560 N.W.2d 477 (1997). Finally, statutes relating to the same subject matter are to be construed together as if they were one law, with effect being given to every provision. In re Interest of AaronK., 250 Neb. 489, 550 N.W.2d 13 (1996); Slagle v. J.P.Theisen Sons, Inc., 251 Neb. 904, 560 N.W.2d 758 (1997).

Analysis

Construing the related statutes, we find that § 79-1202 and § 79-1203 clearly and unambiguously establish that 19 ESUs shall exist through July 1, 1998. The numbers and boundary lines of both ESU #12 and ESU #13 are specifically set forth in § 79-1203 (Supp. 1997) and, by the terms of that statute, are to exist at least "[u]ntil July 1, 1998."

You have noted that the reorganization process, which allows ESUs to petition the State Board of Education for approval of boundary changes via mergers, became operative on September 13, 1997, and contains no mention of delaying, until July 1, 1998, action on a petition. The reorganization process, itself, however, cannot be examined without consideration of the underlying boundaries which have been explicitly set forth in both § 79-1202 and § 79-1203. Both statutes clearly contemplate that existing ESUs will remain in effect through July 1, 1998, and that educational service units may be created by merger at any time after that date.

To conclude that ESU mergers could become effective prior to the date set forth in § 79-1202 and § 79-1203, we would have to ignore the reference to the "July 1, 1998," effective date which is contained in both of those statutes. As the Nebraska Supreme Court has directed, we must give effect to all parts of these statutes — without omission of any sentence, clause, or word. State v. Kelley, 249 Neb. 99, 541 N.W.2d 645 (1996); Omaha Public Power Dist. v. Nebraska Dep't of Revenue,248 Neb. 518, 537 N.W.2d 312 (1995). The statutory inclusion of "July 1, 1998," signifies that, until the date, there shall exist 19 educational service units. After that date, the State Board of Education may authorize merger, dissolution, or creation of ESUs as authorized by the "Educational Service Units Act."

Since we have concluded that the language of § 79-1202 and § 79-1203 is plain and direct, there is no need to resort to the legislative history of these statutes' enactment in order to construe their meaning.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion No. (1998), (Neb. 1998).

Opinion No. (1998) (Opinion No. (1998)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Kelley
541 N.W.2d 645 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1996)
Omaha Public Power District v. Nebraska Department of Revenue
537 N.W.2d 312 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1995)
Scotts Bluff County v. Department of Social Services
550 N.W.2d 13 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1996)
County of Douglas v. Muchemore
560 N.W.2d 477 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1997)
Metropolitan Utilities District v. Balka
560 N.W.2d 795 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1997)
Slagle v. J.P. Theisen & Sons, Inc.
560 N.W.2d 758 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1997)
Nickel v. Saline County School District No. 163
559 N.W.2d 480 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1997)