Opinion No. (1996)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports·Decided March 6, 1996·Published

Opinion

Dear Executive Director Holt,

¶ 0 This office has received your request for an Attorney General Opinion in which you asked, in effect, the following question:

Does the Medical Technology and Research Authority of Oklahomaperform essentially a local function so that the Authority is notrequired to promulgate its rules pursuant to the OklahomaAdministrative Procedures Act, 75 O.S. 1991 and Supp. 1995, §§250-323?

¶ 1 In order to answer your question, it is necessary to review portions of the Administrative Procedures Act, 75 O.S. 1991 andSupp. 1995, §§ 250-323 (the "APA") and the statutes which created the Medical Technology and Research Authority of Oklahoma (the "Authority").

¶ 2 A primary purpose of the APA is to create a framework under which agencies of the State of Oklahoma promulgate rules for the operations and procedures of those agencies. Id. An "agency," for purposes of the APA, is defined as:

[A]ny constitutionally or statutorily created state board, bureau, commission, department, authority, public trust in which the state is a beneficiary, or interstate commission, except:

a. the Legislature or any branch, committee or officer thereof, and

b. the courts[.]

75 O.S.Supp. 1995, § 250.3[75-250.3](1).

¶ 3 A "rule" is defined as:

[A]ny agency statement or group of related statements of general applicability and future effect that implements, interprets or prescribes law or policy, or describes the procedure or practice requirements of the agency.

75 O.S.Supp. 1995, § 250.3[75-250.3](2).

¶ 4 This section includes several exceptions to the definition of a rule which have no application to your question.

¶ 5 In general, agencies of the State are required to promulgate their rules in accordance with the provisions of Article I of the APA, unless specifically authorized otherwise.75 O.S.Supp. 1995, § 250.4[75-250.4](A)(1). However, the APA specifies certain exceptions to the general requirement:

This Act shall not apply to municipalities, counties, school districts, and other agencies of local government; nor to specialized agencies, authorities, and entities created by the legislature, performing essentially local functions, such as, but not limited to, Urban Renewal Authorities, Port Authorities, City and City-County Planning Commissions, Conservancy and other Districts, and public trusts having a municipality or county, or agency thereof, as beneficiary; but this Act shall apply to public trusts having the State, or any department or agency thereof, as beneficiary.1

75 O.S. 1991, § 250.5[75-250.5] (emphasis added).

¶ 6 Your question, then, is whether the Authority performs an essentially local function as provided by Section 250.5.

¶ 7 The Authority was created by act of the Oklahoma Legislature in 1990. The Authority has the power by statute:

5. To construct, maintain, repair and operate improvement projects, and further to provide operational services to service recipients at such locations within the district as shall be determined by the Authority to be feasible and economically sound, and to enter into contracts with service recipients for operational services. . . .;

6. To issue improvement revenue bonds of the Authority, payable solely from revenues, including the revenues accruing to the trust fund created by this act, for the purpose of paying all or any part of the cost of any one or more improvement projects;

7. To fix and revise from time to time user charges for the use of improvements and improvement projects . . .;

. . . .

10. To acquire within the district in the name of the Authority by purchase or otherwise on such terms and conditions and in such manner as it may deem proper, or by exercise of the right of condemnation in the manner hereinafter provided, such public or private lands, including public parks, playgrounds, or reservations, or parts thereof or rights therein, rights-of-way, property rights, easements, and interests, as it may deem necessary for carrying out the provisions of this act; [and,]

13. To regulate and control all vehicular parking within the district[.]

74 O.S. 1991, § 7054[74-7054].

¶ 8 The Authority executes its powers exclusively within the "district" set forth by statute and which is defined as limited to the immediate area around the University Hospital in Oklahoma City, with a secondary district generally extending 1500 feet beyond the district. 74 O.S. 1991, § 7053[74-7053].

¶ 9 A "project" or "improvement project," for the purposes of Sections 7054 through 7067 is defined to mean:

[A]ny facilities constructed or improvements made under the provisions of this act by the Authority, and shall embrace all buildings, structures, landscaping, infrastructure, utilities, roadways, parking structures, parking lots, sidewalks, personal property and fixtures, equipment and machinery, and other improvements which the Authority may deem necessary for the operation of such improvement projects or in connection with operational services provided by the Authority, together with all property, rights, easements and interests which may be acquired by the Authority for the construction or the operation of such[.]

74 O.S. 1991, § 7053[74-7053](2).

¶ 10 Basic rules of statutory construction are useful in order to determine the affect of rule promulgation requirements on the Authority. "The primary goal of statutory construction is to determine [the] legislative intent" of a statute "in light of its general purpose and object." TXO Production v. OklahomaCorporation Commission, 829 P.2d 964, 968-69 (Okla. 1992). Words in a statute must be understood in their ordinary meaning, except when a contrary intent plainly appears or when otherwise defined by the Legislature. 25 O.S. 1991, § 1[25-1]. Intent must be ascertained from the entire act in light of its purpose. MidwestCity v. Harris, 561 P.2d 1357, 1358 (Okla. 1977). Interpretation must be done in such a way as to make every word and sentence operative rather than render a statutory provision nugatory. TWAv. McKinley, 749 P.2d 108, 110 (Okla. 1988).

¶ 11 The expressed intent of the Legislature in Section 250.5 of the APA is that the APA does not apply to "specialized agencies" which perform "essentially local functions." Section 250.5 identifies several types of "specialized agencies," such as "Urban Renewal Authorities" and "Port Authorities." Although the Authority is not identified by name in Section 250.5, it is evident that all of the duties and powers of the Authority relate to the Authority's functions within the "district" and "secondary district" defined in 74 O.S. 1991, § 7053[74-7053]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion No. (1996), (Okla. Super. Ct. 1996).

Opinion No. (1996) (Opinion No. (1996)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

TWA v. McKinley
1988 OK 5 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1988)
TXO Production Corp. v. Oklahoma Corp. Commission
829 P.2d 964 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1992)
City of Midwest City v. Harris
1977 OK 7 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1977)