Opinion No. (1965) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Opinion No. (1965) Ag

DecidedJuly 6, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of Opinion No. (1965) Ag (Opinion No. (1965) Ag) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Opinion No. (1965) Ag, (Okla. Super. Ct. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION — AG — (1) THE FILING OF A JOURNAL ENTRY OF JUDGEMENT IN A COUNTY OTHER THAN THE ONE IN WHICH IT WAS RENDERED IS BUT A CONTINUANCE OF THE CAUSE OF ACTION ORIGINATING IN THE FIRST COUNTY AND IS NOT A "PROCEEDING" WITHIN THE TERMS OF 19 O.S. 1961 813 [19-813] OR 62 O.S. 1961 337.2 [62-337.2] AND THE COSTS IMPOSED THEREBY CANNOT BE COLLECTED. (2) YOU INQUIRE AS TO THE APPLICABILITY OF THE FEES SET FORTH IN 20 O.S. 1961 110 [20-110], 20 O.S. 1961 111 [20-111], 20 O.S. 1961 112 [20-112] TO THE FILING OF JUDGEMENTS IN OTHER COUNTIES AS PRESCRIBED BY 12 O.S. 1961 706 [12-706] — THE PROVISIONS ABOVE REFERRED TO IN TITLE 20 REFER ONLY TO THE MAKING OF A TRANSCRIPT OF THE PROCEEDINGS BY THE COURT REPORTER. 12 O.S. 1961 706 [12-706] DOES NOT REQUIRE THAT A TRANSCRIPT BE FILED ; ONLY A CERTIFIED JOURNAL ENTRY OF JUDGEMENT THAT HE FEES SET FORTH IN 20 O.S. 1961 111 [20-111] ETC ARE NOT APPLICABLE TO THE FILING OF A JUDGEMENT IN OTHER COUNTIES FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXECUTION. (3) THE PROPER FEES TO BE CHARGED FOR FILING A JOURNAL ENTRY OF JUDGEMENT OF STATE COURTS AND FEDERAL COURTS WHERE SAID JOURNAL ENTRIES ARE RENDERED IN COMPLIANCE WITH 12 O.S. 1961 706 [12-706] IS AN YOU HAVE INFORMED THE COURT CLERKS IN THE PAST. CITE: 19 O.S. 1961 337.2 [19-337.2], 28 O.S. 1961 31 [28-31] (W. J. MONROE) ** SEE: OPINION NO. 68-293 (1968) **

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION — AG — (1) THE FILING OF A JOURNAL ENTRY OF JUDGEMENT IN A COUNTY OTHER THAN THE ONE IN WHICH IT WAS RENDERED IS BUT A CONTINUANCE OF THE CAUSE OF ACTION ORIGINATING IN THE FIRST COUNTY AND IS NOT A "PROCEEDING" WITHIN THE TERMS OF 19 O.S. 1961 813 [19-813] OR 62 O.S. 1961 337.2 [62-337.2] AND THE COSTS IMPOSED THEREBY CANNOT BE COLLECTED. (2) YOU INQUIRE AS TO THE APPLICABILITY OF THE FEES SET FORTH IN 20 O.S. 1961 110 [20-110], 20 O.S. 1961 111 [20-111], 20 O.S. 1961 112 [20-112] TO THE FILING OF JUDGEMENTS IN OTHER COUNTIES AS PRESCRIBED BY 12 O.S. 1961 706 [12-706] — THE PROVISIONS ABOVE REFERRED TO IN TITLE 20 REFER ONLY TO THE MAKING OF A TRANSCRIPT OF THE PROCEEDINGS BY THE COURT REPORTER. 12 O.S. 1961 706 [12-706] DOES NOT REQUIRE THAT A TRANSCRIPT BE FILED ; ONLY A CERTIFIED JOURNAL ENTRY OF JUDGEMENT THAT HE FEES SET FORTH IN 20 O.S. 1961 111 [20-111] ETC ARE NOT APPLICABLE TO THE FILING OF A JUDGEMENT IN OTHER COUNTIES FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXECUTION. (3) THE PROPER FEES TO BE CHARGED FOR FILING A JOURNAL ENTRY OF JUDGEMENT OF STATE COURTS AND FEDERAL COURTS WHERE SAID JOURNAL ENTRIES ARE RENDERED IN COMPLIANCE WITH 12 O.S. 1961 706 [12-706] IS AN YOU HAVE INFORMED THE COURT CLERKS IN THE PAST. CITE: 19 O.S. 1961 337.2 [19-337.2], 28 O.S. 1961 31 [28-31] (W. J. MONROE) ** SEE: OPINION NO. 68-293 (1968) **

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Opinion No. (1965) Ag, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-1965-ag-oklaag-1965.