Opinion No. 170-81 (1981)
This text of Opinion No. 170-81 (1981) (Opinion No. 170-81 (1981)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dear Representative Steinmetz:
This letter is issued in response to your request for an opinion on the following questions:
1. May a fire protection district charge and collect from an insurance company when the district provides ambulance service for a resident of the district and the resident owns an insurance policy which will pay for ambulance services?
2. May a fire protection district charge and collect from insurance companies, or other sources, for answering calls outside of its boundaries?
3. Will the answers to questions number 1 and 2 be different if the property owners of the district are assessed a tax of 15 cents per $100 assessed valuation to pay for ambulance services?
4. Will the answer to question number 1 (in light of question 3) be different if the person receiving the ambulance service is not a resident of the district but receives the service of the fire protection district's ambulance when his injury is suffered while in the district?
In addition to their other powers and duties, fire protection districts are authorized to provide emergency ambulance service, and to levy a tax not to exceed fifteen cents on the $100 assessed valuation to be used exclusively to supply funds for the operation of such service, if the majority of the voters within the district approve the proposition. See §§
1. Any fire protection district which is authorized to provide emergency ambulance service within its district may provide such emergency ambulance service outside its district. When providing emergency ambulance service, a fire protection district may assess and collect a fee for such service.
2. As used in this section "emergency" means a situation resulting from a sudden or unforeseen situation or occurrence that requires immediate action to save life or prevent suffering or disability.
Since the effective date of §
Therefore, in answer to questions 1 and 2 of your opinion request, it is our opinion that a fire protection district rendering emergency ambulance service may collect the fee owed by an individual who has received such service directly from an insurance company providing insurance coverage for that individual. In this respect, the fire protection district stands in the same position as any other provider of service to individuals covered by insurance. That is, although the individual is liable for such payment and must be looked to for satisfaction of all charges unpaid, the fire protection district may, if it so chooses, make orderly arrangements for direct payment from the insurance company.
Furthermore, the facts outlined in your questions 3 and 4 would not cause our answer to questions 1 and 2 to be different. Sections
Sections
Very truly yours,
JOHN ASHCROFT Attorney General
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Opinion No. 170-81 (1981), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-170-81-1981-moag-1981.