Opinion No. 130-81 (1981)

CourtMissouri Attorney General Reports
DecidedJuly 1, 1981
StatusPublished

This text of Opinion No. 130-81 (1981) (Opinion No. 130-81 (1981)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Opinion No. 130-81 (1981), (Mo. 1981).

Opinion

Dear Representative Fretwell:

This letter is in response to your question which asks:

(1) Does section 167.131, RSMo, apply to elementary students in grades kindergarten through grade eight?

(2) Is an unclassified school district responsible for paying the tuition of a resident elementary student who attends an adjoining classified school district but who was not assigned to such adjoining school district by the commissioner of education, or his designee under the provisions of section 167.121, RSMo?

Paragraph 1 of § 167.131, RSMo 1978, states as follows:

The board of education of each district in this state that does not maintain an approved high school offering work through the twelfth grade shall pay the tuition of each pupil resident therein who has completed the work of the highest grade offered in the schools of the district and who attends an approved high school in another district of the same or an adjoining county, or an approved high school maintained in connection with one of the state institutions of higher learning, where work of one or more higher grades is offered.

The primary rule of statutory construction requires us to ascertain the intent of the legislature from the language used and to consider words in their plain and ordinary meaning. State v.Kraus, 530 S.W.2d 684 (Mo. banc 1975), and State ex rel. DravoCorp v. Spradling, 518 S.W.2d 512 (Mo. 1974). It is apparent that the legislature intended the statute to apply only to high school students residing in a school district that does not maintain an approved high school. No similar reference is made in § 167.131 concerning elementary age students.

With respect to the second question you asked, we can find no statutory provision requiring an unclassified school district to be responsible for paying the tuition of a resident elementary student who attends an adjoining classified school district. Therefore, an unclassified school district is not responsible for paying the tuition of a resident elementary student who attends an adjoining classified school district either under § 167.131 or any other statutory provision, except if such child was assigned pursuant to the provisions of § 167.121, RSMo.

Very truly yours,

JOHN ASHCROFT Attorney General

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Teeters v. Currey
518 S.W.2d 512 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1974)
State v. Kraus
530 S.W.2d 684 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Opinion No. 130-81 (1981), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opinion-no-130-81-1981-moag-1981.