Ophthalmic Mutual Insurance v. Geller

Eleventh Circuit

Ophthalmic Mutual Insurance v. Geller

140 F. App'x 910

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided July 27, 2005·No. No. 05-11305; D.C. Docket No. 04-00023-CV-FTM-33-SPC·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Scott L. Geller appeals the judgment of the district court granting Plaintiff Ophthalmic Mutual Insurance Company’s motion for summary judgment. We find no reversible error in the district [911]*911court’s determination that the claims asserted against Plaintiff in the Williams action were excluded under the Plaintiff’s liability insurance policy. We also agree that Defendant’s estoppel argument is not supported by the record. The judgment of the district court is, therefore,

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Scott L. Geller appeals the judgment of the district court granting Plaintiff Ophthalmic Mutual Insurance Company’s motion for summary judgment. We find no reversible error in the district [911]*911court’s determination that the claims asserted against Plaintiff in the Williams action were excluded under the Plaintiff’s liability insurance policy. We also agree that Defendant’s estoppel argument is not supported by the record. The judgment of the district court is, therefore,

AFFIRMED.

Ophthalmic Mutual Insurance v. Geller, 140 F. App'x 910 (11th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

140 F. App'x 910 (Ophthalmic Mutual Insurance v. Geller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.