Ophthalmic Mutual Insurance v. Geller

Eleventh Circuit

Ophthalmic Mutual Insurance v. Geller

140 F. App'x 910

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedJuly 27, 2005

DocketNo. 05-11305; D.C. Docket No. 04-00023-CV-FTM-33-SPC

StatusPublished

This text of 140 F. App'x 910 (Ophthalmic Mutual Insurance v. Geller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ophthalmic Mutual Insurance v. Geller, 140 F. App'x 910 (11th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Scott L. Geller appeals the judgment of the district court granting Plaintiff Ophthalmic Mutual Insurance Company’s motion for summary judgment. We find no reversible error in the district [911]*911court’s determination that the claims asserted against Plaintiff in the Williams action were excluded under the Plaintiff’s liability insurance policy. We also agree that Defendant’s estoppel argument is not supported by the record. The judgment of the district court is, therefore,

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Scott L. Geller appeals the judgment of the district court granting Plaintiff Ophthalmic Mutual Insurance Company’s motion for summary judgment. We find no reversible error in the district [911]*911court’s determination that the claims asserted against Plaintiff in the Williams action were excluded under the Plaintiff’s liability insurance policy. We also agree that Defendant’s estoppel argument is not supported by the record. The judgment of the district court is, therefore,

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

140 F. App'x 910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ophthalmic-mutual-insurance-v-geller-ca11-2005.