Opentv, Inc. v. Matal

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedJanuary 16, 2018
Docket17-1250
StatusUnpublished

This text of Opentv, Inc. v. Matal (Opentv, Inc. v. Matal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Opentv, Inc. v. Matal, (Fed. Cir. 2018).

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

OPENTV, INC., Appellant

v.

JOSEPH MATAL, PERFORMING THE FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR, U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor ______________________

2017-1250 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2015- 01031. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

ERIKA ARNER, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Gar- rett & Dunner, LLP, Reston, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by JOSHUA GOLDBERG, Washington, DC; CORY C. BELL, Boston, MA. WILLIAM LAMARCA, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, ROBERT J. MCMANUS. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and REYNA, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 16, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Opentv, Inc. v. Matal, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opentv-inc-v-matal-cafc-2018.