Opentv, Inc. v. Matal
This text of Opentv, Inc. v. Matal (Opentv, Inc. v. Matal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
OPENTV, INC., Appellant
v.
JOSEPH MATAL, PERFORMING THE FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR, U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor ______________________
2017-1250 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2015- 01031. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
ERIKA ARNER, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Gar- rett & Dunner, LLP, Reston, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by JOSHUA GOLDBERG, Washington, DC; CORY C. BELL, Boston, MA. WILLIAM LAMARCA, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, ROBERT J. MCMANUS. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and REYNA, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
January 16, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Opentv, Inc. v. Matal, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/opentv-inc-v-matal-cafc-2018.