Oparaji v. Citibank, N.A.
101 N.E.3d 972, 77 N.Y.S.3d 331, 31 N.Y.3d 1062
CourtCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors
DecidedMay 3, 2018
Docket2018–275
StatusPublished
This text of 101 N.E.3d 972 (Oparaji v. Citibank, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Oparaji v. Citibank, N.A., 101 N.E.3d 972, 77 N.Y.S.3d 331, 31 N.Y.3d 1062 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2018).
Opinion
***1063Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that this Court does not have jurisdiction to entertain the motion for leave to appeal from the order of the Appellate Division entered in this action commenced in Civil Court of the City of New York ( NY Const., art VI, § 3 [b][7]; CPLR 5602[a] ).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
101 N.E.3d 972, 77 N.Y.S.3d 331, 31 N.Y.3d 1062, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oparaji-v-citibank-na-nycterr-2018.