Op. Atty. Gen. 90

CourtMinnesota Attorney General Reports
DecidedJune 9, 1994
StatusPublished

This text of Op. Atty. Gen. 90 (Op. Atty. Gen. 90) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Minnesota Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Op. Atty. Gen. 90, (Mich. 1994).

Opinion

CONTRACTS: OFFICERS’ INTEREST IN: HQUSING AND REDEVELOPMEN'I`

AUTHORITIES: Housing and Redevelopment Authority _Commissioner is not prohibited from

performing work on projects approved by authority if notice and nonparticipation requirements of Minn. Stat. § 469.009 (1992) are met. Minn. Stat. §§ 469.009, 471.87 (1992)

(Cr. Rcf. 430)

June 9, 1994

Ernest .I. Danflinger 315 Fourth Street Farmington, Mn 55024

Dear Mr. Darflinger:

In your.letter to the office of the Attorney General, you set forth substantially the following:

FAC'I`S

Under Minn. Stat. §469.003 (1992), each city in this state may establish a Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA). A Housing and Redevelopment Authority is composed of five commissioners appointed by the mayor with the approval of the governing body of the city.

The City of Farmington has established a Housing and Redevelopment Agency. Under the powers granted to in Minn. Stat. §469.012 (1992), the Farmington HRA selects projects for redevelopment and enters into contracts with developers

One of the current Farmington HRA commissioners is the owner and operator of a cabinet manufacturing business. This commissioner has stated his intent to bid on cabinet work for the developments which are the subject of Farmington HRA contracts for approved projects.

You ask substantially the following questions: QUESTION ONE Do the conflict of interest provisions set forth in Minn. Stat. §469.009 (1992) and Minn. Stat. §471.87 (1992) prohibit this Commissioner from bidding on and participating in projects approved by the Farmington HRA? OPINION

Subject to the conditions set forth below. we answer your question in the negative Prior

to 1981, a commissioner of a Housing and Redevelopment Authority was prohibited from

Ernest J. Danflinger Page 2

having any interest, direct or indirect. in any contract or proposed contract in connection with any project. Minn. Stat. § 462.431 (1980`) ln 1981. that absolute prohibition was replaced by Minn. Stat. § 462.432, which adopted a notice and non-participation requirement for situations in which official actions of a commissioner or employee could substantially affect "his financial interests, or those of a business with which he is associated." Act of May 4, 1981, ch. 79. 1981 Minn. Laws 313-315. Thus it appears to have been contemplated that, after 1981, commissioners might lawfully have a personal interest in projects or contracts approved by the HRA. Those notice and non-participation provisions are now contained in Minn. Stat. § 469.009 (1992). That section provides ing Lia that a potential conflict ot` interest is present when:

...the commissioner knows or has reason to know that the organization with which the commissioner is affiliated is or is reasonably likely to become a participant in a project or development which will be affected by the action or decision.

The statute requires a commissioner who has a potential conflict of interest to disclose that potential conflict to the commissioners of the Authority in writing no later than one week after the commissioner becomes aware of the potential contiict. That commissioner is further prohibited from attempting to influence any employee in any matter related to the action or decision in question, cannot take part in the action or decision. and shall not be counted toward a quorum during the portion of any meeting of the Authority in which the action or decision is to be considered

ln addition to the disclosure and non-participation requirements pertaining generally to actions or decisions of the Authority, Sectron 469.009. subd. 3, specifically provides:

A commissioner or employee of an Authority w@ knowingly talg:§ part in any manner in making any sale, lease, or contract in the commissioner’s or employee’s official capacity in which the commissioner or employee has a personal financial interest is guilty ot` a gross misdemeanor.

(Emphasis addedl.

Ernest J. Danflinger Page 3

Therefore. it appears to be further contemplated that HRA commissioners may have a personal financial interests in sales. leases. or contracts of the Authority, but, in such cases, may not knowingly participate in their official capacities. 'I`his approach differs from that taken in Minn. Stat. § 471.87 (1992). which applies generally to public officers That section

provides:

to_ take pgt in any manner in making any sale. lease. or contract in official capacity shall n_o_t voluntarilv have a nersonal financial interest in that sale. lease or contract or personally benefit financially therefrom. Every public officer who violates this provision is guilty of a misdemeanor.

(Emphasis added).

Our office has previously held that this prohibition applies whenever an officer is "authorized to take pa't" in making a contract and may not be avoided by the officer voluntarily abstaining from participation E, gg, Ops. Atty. Gen. 90a December 29, 1958; 901~3¢5 February 25, 1954.

In seeking to resolve the apparent contlict, we turn to the rules of statutory construction, as set forth by the Legislature. ln particular. Minn. Stat. § 645.26. subd. l (1992) provides:

When a general provision in a law is in conflict with a special provision in the same or another law, the two shall be construed. if possible. so that effect may be given to both. If the conflict between the two provisions be irreconcilable the special provision shall prevail and shall be construed as an exception to the general provision. unless the general provision shall be enacted at a later session and it shall be the manifest intention of the legislature that such general provision shall prevail.

Where two statutes contain general and special provisions which seemingly are in conflict. the general provision will be taken to affect only such situations within its general language as are not within the language of the special provision Ehlert v. Graue, 292 Minn.

393. 195, N.W.2d 823. 826 (1972); Nathan v. St. Paul MLMI lns. Co., 243 Minn. 430,

Emest J . Danflinger Page 4 June 9 , l 9 9 4

68 N.W.Zd 385, (1955). Thus in our view. the "special" notice and non-participation provisions of Minn. Stat. § 469.009 will apply to specific circumstances where a commissioner or affiliated organization has a personal interest in. or intends to participate in, a project or contract to be approved by the HRA.

Another arguable approach to the same result may be to observe that. by virtue of the language contained in Section 469.009. a commissioner who knows, or has reason to know of a personal conflict of interest in an HRA project is simply not "authorized to take part" officially in making contracts associated with that project. and is thus not technically within the prohibition of Section 471 .87.

From either perspective. we conclude that a commissioner may enter contracts in his or her private capacity upon HRA projects, if the notice and non-participation requirements of Section 469.009 are met. In that regard, while the commissioners business will not be one of the developers whose projects will be directly approved by the HRA. it is possible that the commissioner could end up participating in the project through the bidding process conducted by the developer. The statute not only prohibits a commissioner from participating in decisions where the commissioners later participation is certain. but also prohibits participation in decision making when the likelihood is indirect. Therefore, in our view, the commissioner should follow the disclosure and non-participation provisions set forth in Minn. Stat. §469.009 whenever the commissioner intends to bid on work to be performed in a development project.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nathan v. St. Paul Mutual Insurance Co.
68 N.W.2d 385 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1955)
Ehlert v. Graue
195 N.W.2d 823 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Op. Atty. Gen. 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/op-atty-gen-90-minnag-1994.