Op. Atty. Gen. 1007

CourtMinnesota Attorney General Reports
DecidedMarch 11, 1994
StatusPublished

This text of Op. Atty. Gen. 1007 (Op. Atty. Gen. 1007) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Minnesota Attorney General Reports primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Op. Atty. Gen. 1007, (Mich. 1994).

Opinion

JOINT POWERS ACT: CHARTER SCHOOLS: Charter schools formed as contemplated by Minn. Stat. § 120.064 (1992 and Supp. 1993) are not "governrnental unirs" as the term is defined in the Joint Powers Act, Minn. Stat. §471.59, subd. 1 (_1992); consequently, such charter schools may not be a party to a joint powers agreement.

ware-n ll, 19% (cr. Ref. co lanham 160¢)

Thomas S. Deans. Esq.

Knutson, Flynn, I-Ietland. Deans & Olsen Suite 1900

Minnesota World Trade Center

30 East Seventh Street

St. Paul, Minnesota 55101

Dear Mr. Deans:

In your letter to Attorney General Hubert H. Hurnphrey lII you present substantially

the following: FACTS

Independent Schooi District No. 834 (Stillwater) is the spc.'isor of a charter school formed pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 120.064 (Supp. 1993). The charter school. referred to as New Heights School, is organized and operated as a nonprofit corporation under Minn. Stat. ch. 317A and provides an educational program as an outcome-based school as contemplated by section 120.064.

District No. 834 is a member of the Minnesota School District Liquid Asset Fund Plus (MSDLAF+). a Minnesota joint powers entity formed ; pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 471.59. New Height.s School; would;like to become a -'" .=.-”~"== member of the MSDLAF+.

You then ask substantially the following: QUESTION

Whether New Heights School is authorized under the provisions of Minn. Stat. § 471.59 to become a member of MSDLAF+?

Thomas S. Deans. Esq. Page 2

lerch 11, ngu

OPINION

In our opinion. New Heights Schooi. as a charter school. is not authorized under Minn. Stat. § 471.59 (1992l, the loint Powers Act. to become a member ot` a joint powers organization because it is not a governmental unit as the term is used in the Act.

Uuder the loint Powers Act_ only governmental units may enter into agreements for the joint exercise of their powers. in pertinent part. subdivision l of section 471.59 provides that:

The term " governmental unit" as used in this section includes every city, countyt town. school district other political subdivision of this or another state, another state. and any agency ot the State ot` Minnesota or the United States, and includes any instrumentality or` a governmental unit. For the purpose of this section. an instrumentality ot` a governmental unit means an instrumentality having independent policy making and appropriating authority.

To qualify as a "governmental miit" under subdivision l, we conclude that such a unit must be a public entity. Except for the last term. "any instrumentality ot` a governmental unit," all of the preceding examples listed in subdivision l are clearly public entities. Although there may be instances in which an instrumentality of a governmental unit need not necessarily be a

public entity, that is not the case under:section 471.59. Ejusdem generis. a rule ot` statutory construction provides that "[a]s a general rule the ‘-_-_”= _~;~vords of a statute are to be construed with reference to tire words with which they are associated. and when those used in a particular sense and having a specific meaning are followed by others of a general meaning, the latter are to be construed as applicable only to things of a like nature to those designated by the former." M…M Di . No , 151 Minn. 52, 56~7, 185 N.W. 961, 963 (1921). “The principal ‘ n underlying rule of ejusdem generis is that the legislature had in mind things of the same kind and was speaking of them as a class." State v. §nd, 232 Minn. 266. 272. 45 N.W.2d 378, 381 (1950). Since all of the preceding examples listed in subdivision l are public entities, it is

'- _ reasonable to conclude that the term "any instrumentality of a governmental unit" includes

Thomas S. Deans. Esq. Page 3 March ll, ;99a

only public entities. 'I'hus. although the term " governmental unit" as used in subdivision l is

broad in its scope, it encompasses only public entities and does not include private entities

Compare Minn. Stat. §471.16, subd. 1 (1992) which allows various public entities to

"cooperate among themselves or with any nonprofit organization" to jointly operate recreational programs (Emphasis added.)

A charter school is not a "governmental unit." Minn. Stat. § 120.064, subd. 4(a) (Supp. 1993} provides that a charter school "shall be organized and operated as a cooperative under chapter 308A or nonprofit corporation under chapter 317A." Minn. Stat. chs. 308A md 317A are two of the traditional options t`or the creation of private organizations and companies1 Nothing in either chapter suggests that organizing as either a cooperative or a nonprofit corporation would result in the formation of a governmental unit.

Similarly, nothing in Minn. Stat. § 120.064 establishes a charter school as a public entity or a governmental unit. Although a school district or, in some cases. the State Board of Education acts as the "sponsor" of a charter school, the charter school is thereafter generally organized. governed and operated aia a private eittity. Minn. Stat. § 120.064. subd. 4(a) (Supp. 1993). The relationship between the sponsor and the charter school is essentially

-=_ contractual and the contract may be terminated. Minn. Stat. § 120..064 subds. 5 and 21 (Supp. 1993).

Chartcr schools are not generally subject to state laws affecting public education Except as otherwise provided in section 120.064. a charter school is "exempt from glme grid grigg app|j§gble tt_) a school board ;ir a sghgol district . . . ." Minn. Stat. § 120.064, subd. 7 (1992) (emphasis added). While subdivision 7 enables a charter school to “Qe§_t_§g

ggmply with one or more provisions of statutes or rules." that language only allows a charter

1. A school district. by contrast. is statutorily classified as a public corporation Minn. Stat. § 122.02 (1992).

‘li{!~

Thomas S. Deans. Esq. Page 4

llar'ch ll , 19914

school to assume obligations: it does not empower a charter school to assume the authority of a school district nor does it alter the legal status of a charter school as a private enrity. l_g_,_ (emphasis added). Subdivisions 8, 9 and 12 of section 120.064 ( 1992 and Supp. 1993} establish minimal stanitory requirements which a charter school must meet to be eli't"-'¢le for public funding. Although the standards are similar or identical to some of those mem of public schools.:“l nothing in these subdivisions transforms a charter school formed as a private. nonprofit corporation into a public or governmental body. Sirnilarly, the eligibility for public funding does not alter the private nature of a charter school. Minn. Stat. § 124.248 (1992 and Supp. 1993) allows a charter school to qualify for certain state education aids "as though it were a school district." 'I`his language certainly suggests that a charter school is not a school district Moreover, receipt of public funding for education is not limited to public schools §_t;e;_, g_=_gg, Minn. Stat. § 123.3514 (1992 and Supp. 1993) (Private, post-secondary institutions eligible to receive public education funding under the Post-Secondary Enrollment Options Act); Minn. Stat. §§ 123.931-.947 (1992 and Supp. 1993) (Public education aids for nonpublic school children); and Minn. Stat. § 125.23 (1992} (public education aid for private alternative education programsl. The statutory language requiring that a charter school "must be nonsectarian" is language generally applied to private entities to be eligible for public education starting mg g._g_, Minn. stat §123.3514, subd. 4 (1992)3 and Minn. stat § 126.23 (1992).4

z " . 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. End
45 N.W.2d 378 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Op. Atty. Gen. 1007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/op-atty-gen-1007-minnag-1994.