Oorell Sharrieff v. J v. Beale, Assistant Warden G.L. Bass J.C. Farrow Wesley A. McCathy R.D. Green Unknown Jones J. Halsey-Harris

60 F.3d 824, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24903, 1995 WL 419293
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 13, 1995
Docket95-6543
StatusPublished

This text of 60 F.3d 824 (Oorell Sharrieff v. J v. Beale, Assistant Warden G.L. Bass J.C. Farrow Wesley A. McCathy R.D. Green Unknown Jones J. Halsey-Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oorell Sharrieff v. J v. Beale, Assistant Warden G.L. Bass J.C. Farrow Wesley A. McCathy R.D. Green Unknown Jones J. Halsey-Harris, 60 F.3d 824, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24903, 1995 WL 419293 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

60 F.3d 824
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Oorell SHARRIEFF, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
J.V. BEALE, Assistant Warden; G.L. Bass; J.C. Farrow;
Wesley A. McCathy; R.D. Green; Unknown Jones;
J. Halsey-Harris, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-6543.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 22, 1995.
Decided July 13, 1995.

Oorell Sharrieff, appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richmond, VA, for appellees.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's* order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Sharrieff v. Beale, No. CA-94-20 (E.D. Va. Oct. 28, 1994, Dec. 8, 1994, & Mar. 15, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

The parties consented to trial by the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(c)(1) (1988)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 F.3d 824, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24903, 1995 WL 419293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oorell-sharrieff-v-j-v-beale-assistant-warden-gl-b-ca4-1995.