Onyx Financial Group, Inc. v. International Waste Systems, Inc.

619 So. 2d 1036, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6150, 1993 WL 191952
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 8, 1993
DocketNo. 92-2658
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 619 So. 2d 1036 (Onyx Financial Group, Inc. v. International Waste Systems, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Onyx Financial Group, Inc. v. International Waste Systems, Inc., 619 So. 2d 1036, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6150, 1993 WL 191952 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the defendants Onyx Financial Group, Inc., et ah, from a non-final order granting the plaintiff International Waste System’s motion for a default in an action sounding in fraud. The motion for default was granted because the defendants failed to comply with a prior court order which directed that the corporate defendant obtain new counsel within twenty days of the entry of order and that the individual defendants either obtain new counsel or announce they were proceeding pro se within the same twenty-day time period; the court, at the same time, granted a motion to withdraw as counsel filed by defendants’ prior attorney. Because (1) the defendants did, in fact, obtain counsel in the cause prior to the entry of the order granting a default, although not within the prescribed twenty-day time period [counsel filed a notice of appearance forty days from the date of the subject court order], and (2) no finding was made by the court that the defendants intentionally disobeyed the court’s order, we hold, in accord with settled law, that the subject order was erroneously entered. See, e.g., Carillon Corp. v. Devick, 554 So.2d 630, 632 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989) and cases collected; Fla. R.Civ.P. 1.420, 1.500(c). Accordingly, the order under review is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to deny the plaintiff’s motion for default.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cherry Roofing Enterprises, Inc. v. Diane Bader
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2024
Visoly v. KLUGER PERETZ KAPLAN & BERLIN
707 So. 2d 427 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
619 So. 2d 1036, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6150, 1993 WL 191952, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/onyx-financial-group-inc-v-international-waste-systems-inc-fladistctapp-1993.