Onward Const. Co. v. Harris

144 N.Y.S. 318
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedDecember 4, 1913
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 144 N.Y.S. 318 (Onward Const. Co. v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Onward Const. Co. v. Harris, 144 N.Y.S. 318 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

SEABURY, J.

This is an action to recover rent upon a written lease. The defendant pleaded constructive eviction. The facts are undisputed.

The plaintiff operated an apartment hotel. The defendant was the lessee of an apartment therein. On January 9 and again on January 10, 1910, the treasurer of the plaintiff wrote letters to the defendant which were so grossly insulting and threatening in character as to seriously and substantially deprive the defendant of the beneficial enjoyment of the premises demised, and constituted such a breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment as to constructively evict the defendant. The plaintiff’s claim that it cannot be held for the acts of its treasurer cannot be sustained, in view of the authority which it permitted its treasurer to exercise in the apartment hotel.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blessing v. Fetters
181 P. 108 (California Court of Appeal, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
144 N.Y.S. 318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/onward-const-co-v-harris-nyappterm-1913.