Onuaguluchi v. Henderson
This text of 64 F. App'x 656 (Onuaguluchi v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
The district court did not abuse its discretion when it denied Stella Onuaguluchi’s motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal. Onuaguluchi failed to demonstrate “excusable neglect” through the existence of extraordinary circumstances and likelihood of an unjust result. See Marx v. Loral Crop., 87 F.3d 1049, 1053 (9th Cir.1996). “Inadvertence or mistake of counsel does not constitute excusable neglect.” Id. (citation omitted).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
64 F. App'x 656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/onuaguluchi-v-henderson-ca9-2003.