Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.

Opinion

ns 17-cv-558 Underhill, C.J. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 22™ day of June, two thousand twenty-one. Present: Susan L. Camey, Richard J. Sullivan, Joseph F. Bianco, Circuit Judges.

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., et al., Petitioners, v. 21-661 Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Board, et al., Respondents.

Petitioners request, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f), leave to appeal the district court’s order granting class certification, and move for leave to file a reply. Upon due consideration, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion for leave to file a reply is GRANTED, but the Rule 23(f) petition is DENIED because an immediate appeal is not warranted. See Sumitomo Copper Litig. v. Credit Lyonnais Rouse, Ltd., 262 F.3d 134, 139-40 (2d Cir. 2001). FOR THE COURT: Catherine O’ Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of Court

□□ . o's 5 O Ue O'Hagan Wolfeélerk States Court Bf Appear, \Second Circuit ee UL RCUIT . ‘ x cepa