Ontario County Department of Social Services v. Jackson

212 A.D.2d 1056, 624 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1978
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 3, 1995·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court properly denied the objections to the Hearing Examiner’s order without inquiring further into respondent’s ability to pay child support arrears that accrued during the period of respondent’s incarceration. "[I]t is undisputed that [respondent’s] current financial hardship is solely the result of his wrongful conduct culminating in a felony conviction and imprisonment” (Matter of Knights v Knights, 71 NY2d 865, 867). Thus, the court properly declined to reduce or annul the accrued arrears (see, Family Ct Act § 451). (Appeal from Order of Ontario County Family Court, Harvey, J.—Child Support.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Fallon, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ontario County Department of Social Services v. Jackson, 212 A.D.2d 1056, 624 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1978 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

212 A.D.2d 1056 (Ontario County Department of Social Services v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of J.A. v. A.B.
2005 NY Slip Op 25434 (Ulster Family Court, 2005)
J.A.E. v. A.B.
10 Misc. 3d 446 (NYC Family Court, 2005)
Onondaga County Department of Social Services v. Timothy S.
294 A.D.2d 27 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Furman v. Barnes
293 A.D.2d 781 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)