Onondaga County Water Authority v. City of Syracuse
97 A.D.2d 945, 468 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20748
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Special Term properly denied defendant’s motion to amend its answer to assert second and third counterclaims. Neither of the proposed counterclaims states a cause of action (see Grafer v Marko Beer & Beverages, 36 AD2d 295, 296, app dsmd 29 NY2d 641). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Balio, J. — amend answer.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Denman, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Onondaga County Water Authority v. City of Syracuse, 97 A.D.2d 945, 468 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20748 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).
97 A.D.2d 945 (Onondaga County Water Authority v. City of Syracuse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Grafer v. Marko Beer & Beverages, Inc.
273 N.E.2d 316 (New York Court of Appeals, 1971)
Grafer v. Marko Beer & Beverages, Inc.
36 A.D.2d 295 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1971)