Onofrio v. Onofrio

561 So. 2d 1200, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1794, 1990 WL 29509
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 20, 1990·No. No. 89-2404·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant appellant’s motion for clarification of our order dismissing her appeal, vacate the dismissal, and reinstate the appeal.

Cezarina Onofrio moved for summary judgment pursuant to rule 1.510, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, in her action to set aside a judgment as void. The trial court denied her motion, and she appealed. This court concluded that the order appealed was not an appealable non-final order, and dismissed the appeal. Onofrio sought clarification, urging that although her motion requested summary judgment pursuant to rule 1.510, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, the ground on which it was predicated was that the underlying judgment was void, and thus the judgment was an appealable, non-final order under rule 9.130(a)(5), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, as an order entered on motion pursuant to rule 1.540, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. The committee note to rule 9.130(a)(5), Florida Rules of Appellate Pro[1201] cedure, states that the rule applies to orders on motions which enumerate any of the grounds set forth in rule 1.540, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. Because a void judgment is a ground for relief from judgment pursuant to rule 1.540(b)(4), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, we reinstate the appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Onofrio v. Onofrio, 561 So. 2d 1200, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1794, 1990 WL 29509 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

561 So. 2d 1200 (Onofrio v. Onofrio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Albano v. Albano
579 So. 2d 757 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)