Onofri v. Syracuse China Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Onofri v. Syracuse China Corp.

59 A.D.2d 633, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13487

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 16, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 59 A.D.2d 633 (Onofri v. Syracuse China Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Onofri v. Syracuse China Corp., 59 A.D.2d 633, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13487 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion pursuant to section 800.12 of the Rules of Practice (22 NYCRR 800.12 [App Div, 3d Dept]) granted, without costs, and the clerk is directed to accept appellants’ record and brief provided they are filed and served on or before December 5, 1977. Motion for leave to prosecute appeals taken August 14, 1975 and January 27, 1977 upon a combined record and brief granted, without costs. If appellants are unable, within this time period, to file a record in compliance with section 17 of the hoard’s rules (12 NYCRR 300.18), the appeal need not be perfected upon a record certified by the board. In such case, the appeal may be heard upon a single copy of the record the contents of which shall be certified in the manner specified by the Rules of Practice (22 NYCRR 800.7 [b]). (See Matter of Garcia v Brassiere Rest., 59 AD2d 628.) Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion pursuant to section 800.12 of the Rules of Practice (22 NYCRR 800.12 [App Div, 3d Dept]) granted, without costs, and the clerk is directed to accept appellants’ record and brief provided they are filed and served on or before December 5, 1977. Motion for leave to prosecute appeals taken August 14, 1975 and January 27, 1977 upon a combined record and brief granted, without costs. If appellants are unable, within this time period, to file a record in compliance with section 17 of the hoard’s rules (12 NYCRR 300.18), the appeal need not be perfected upon a record certified by the board. In such case, the appeal may be heard upon a single copy of the record the contents of which shall be certified in the manner specified by the Rules of Practice (22 NYCRR 800.7 [b]). (See Matter of Garcia v Brassiere Rest., 59 AD2d 628.) Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 A.D.2d 633, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/onofri-v-syracuse-china-corp-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack