Onofrey v. Resnik

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Onofrey v. Resnik

124 A. 401, 100 Conn. 748, 1924 Conn. LEXIS 77

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedMay 8, 1924

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 124 A. 401 (Onofrey v. Resnik) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Onofrey v. Resnik, 124 A. 401, 100 Conn. 748, 1924 Conn. LEXIS 77 (Colo. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

*749 Per Curiam.

The evidence was conflicting and hence the determination by the jury of the issue of negligence and contributory negligence in favor of the defendants must stand unless we can say as matter of law that the jury’s conclusions were such that reasoning minds could not reasonably have reached them. We are clearly of the opinion that we would not be justified in so holding as matter of law.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*749 Per Curiam.

The evidence was conflicting and hence the determination by the jury of the issue of negligence and contributory negligence in favor of the defendants must stand unless we can say as matter of law that the jury’s conclusions were such that reasoning minds could not reasonably have reached them. We are clearly of the opinion that we would not be justified in so holding as matter of law.

There is no error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 A. 401, 100 Conn. 748, 1924 Conn. LEXIS 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/onofrey-v-resnik-conn-1924.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack