Onofrey v. Resnik

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Onofrey v. Resnik

124 A. 401, 100 Conn. 748, 1924 Conn. LEXIS 77

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided May 8, 1924·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*749 Per Curiam.

The evidence was conflicting and hence the determination by the jury of the issue of negligence and contributory negligence in favor of the defendants must stand unless we can say as matter of law that the jury’s conclusions were such that reasoning minds could not reasonably have reached them. We are clearly of the opinion that we would not be justified in so holding as matter of law.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*749 Per Curiam.

The evidence was conflicting and hence the determination by the jury of the issue of negligence and contributory negligence in favor of the defendants must stand unless we can say as matter of law that the jury’s conclusions were such that reasoning minds could not reasonably have reached them. We are clearly of the opinion that we would not be justified in so holding as matter of law.

There is no error.

Onofrey v. Resnik, 124 A. 401, 100 Conn. 748, 1924 Conn. LEXIS 77 (Colo. 1924).

Pincite

124 A. 401 (Onofrey v. Resnik) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related