Online Merchants Guild v. Maduros

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedMarch 2, 2021
Docket2:20-cv-01952
StatusUnknown

This text of Online Merchants Guild v. Maduros (Online Merchants Guild v. Maduros) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Online Merchants Guild v. Maduros, (E.D. Cal. 2021).

Opinion

1 XAVIER BECERRA, State Bar No. 118517 Attorney General of California 2 MOLLY K. MOSLEY, State Bar No. 185483 Supervising Deputy Attorney General 3 MICHAEL SAPOZNIKOW, State Bar No. 242640 GINA TOMASELLI, State Bar No. 267090 4 Deputy Attorneys General 1300 I Street, Suite 125 5 P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 6 Telephone: (916) 210-7344 Fax: (916) 323-7095 7 E-mail: Michael.Sapoznikow@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendant Nicolas Maduros, 8 Director, California Department of Tax & Fee Administration 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 ONLINE MERCHANTS GUILD, No. 2:20-cv-01952-MCE-DB 14 Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING DISCLOSURE OF 15 v. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION

NICOLAS MADUROS, DIRECTOR, 17 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TAX & FEE ADMINISTRATION, 18 Defendant. 19

20 21 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 22 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of 23 confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 24 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be 25 warranted. In particular, this action relates to California state taxes, and California law 26 prohibits the disclosure of certain taxpayer information. Accordingly, the parties hereby 27 stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order, 28 which is based on the Model Protective Order of the United States District Court for the 1 Northern District of California. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer 2 blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it 3 affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items 4 that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The 5 parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated 6 Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Civil 7 Local Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that 8 will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 9 2. DEFINITIONS 10 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of 11 information or items under this Order. 12 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is 13 generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under 14 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). 15 2.3 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel 16 (as well as their support staff). 17 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items 18 that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 19 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the 20 medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among 21 other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated 22 in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 23 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 24 pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an 25 expert witness or as a consultant in this action. 26 2.7 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. 27 House Counsel includes attorneys employed by the California Department of Tax and 28 1 Fee Administration and does not include Outside Counsel of Record, attorneys 2 employed by the California Department of Justice, or any other outside counsel. 3 2.8 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other 4 legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 5 2.9 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to 6 this action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have 7 appeared in this action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm or which 8 has appeared on behalf of that party or with the California Department of Justice. 9 2.10 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, 10 employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their 11 support staffs). 12 2.11 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery 13 Material in this action. 14 2.12 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support 15 services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or 16 demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and 17 their employees and subcontractors. 18 2.13 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated 19 as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 20 2.14 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from 21 a Producing Party. 22 3. SCOPE 23 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected 24 Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from 25 Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected 26 Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their 27 Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. However, the protections conferred by this 28 Stipulation and Order do not cover the following information: (a) any information that is in 1 the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving Party or becomes part of the 2 public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of publication not 3 involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the public record through 4 trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to the 5 disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who 6 obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the 7 Designating Party. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate 8 agreement or order. 9 4. DURATION 10 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed 11 by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing 12 or a court order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of 13 (1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) 14 final judgment herein after the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, 15 remands, trials, or reviews of this action, including the time limits for filing any motions or 16 applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law. 17 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 18 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each 19 Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order 20 must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the 21 appropriate standards. The Designating Party must designate for protection only those 22 parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify – so 23 that other portions of the material, documents, items, or communications for which 24 protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. 25 Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Online Merchants Guild v. Maduros, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/online-merchants-guild-v-maduros-caed-2021.