Onken v. Onken
196 A. 688, 123 N.J. Eq. 156, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 633
Opinion
* The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Advisory Master Child in the court of chancery.
*161 For affirmance — Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Walker, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Onken v. Onken, 196 A. 688, 123 N.J. Eq. 156, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 633 (N.J. Ct. App. 1938).
196 A. 688 (Onken v. Onken) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
ROCCO J. CANONICA v. MARIE CANONICA (FM-08-5478-93, GLOUCESTER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2022
Homeowners Mortgage of America, Inc. v. Chase Home Finance, LLC
668 S.E.2d 561 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2008)
Lafetra v. Beveridge
1 A.2d 68 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1938)