Onita Hayward Adm. v. Fiserv New Haven, No. Cv93 035 31 83 (Mar. 2, 1995)

1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 1855
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedMarch 1, 1995
DocketNo. CV93 035 31 83
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 1855 (Onita Hayward Adm. v. Fiserv New Haven, No. Cv93 035 31 83 (Mar. 2, 1995)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Onita Hayward Adm. v. Fiserv New Haven, No. Cv93 035 31 83 (Mar. 2, 1995), 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 1855 (Colo. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT The motion for summary judgment is denied. See Reboni, Adm.,et al v. Case Brothers, Inc., et al, 137 Conn. 501 (1951); Bogorattv. Pratt Whitney, et al, 114 Conn. 126 (1932); Kasowitz v. TheMutual Construction Company, 154 Conn. 607 (1967); Battistelli v.Connohio Inc., 138 Conn. 646 (1952); Bates v. The Connecticut PowerCompany, 130 Conn. 256 (1943).

William L. Hadden, Jr., Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kasowitz v. Mutual Construction Co.
228 A.2d 149 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1967)
Battistelli v. Connohio, Inc.
88 A.2d 372 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1952)
Bogoratt v. Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Co.
157 A. 860 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1932)
Bates v. Connecticut Power Co.
33 A.2d 342 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1943)
Reboni v. Case Brothers, Inc.
78 A.2d 887 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 1855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/onita-hayward-adm-v-fiserv-new-haven-no-cv93-035-31-83-mar-2-1995-connsuperct-1995.