Ong v. Whipple

3 P. 898, 3 Wash. Terr. 233
Washington Territory·Decided July 20, 1882·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Wingard

delivered the opinion of the court.

In this ease we are of the opinion that the guardian of the plaintiff being dead, he would be without any adequate remedy unless he can maintain his suit against the executor. (Pedeman, Adm’r of Robb, 8 Ohio, 227.) The judgment of the District Court in sustaining the demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint is therefore reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings. We do not consider the complaint exposed to the second, third, and fourth objections urged by the appellee.

Greene, C. J., and Hoyt, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ong v. Whipple, 3 P. 898, 3 Wash. Terr. 233 (Wash. Super. Ct. 1882).

3 P. 898 (Ong v. Whipple) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilcox v. Mathews
456 P.2d 96 (Washington Supreme Court, 1969)
Loucks v. Morley
179 P. 529 (California Court of Appeal, 1919)